Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31112330›Full record

ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2020

Safety Planning on Crisis Lines: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Perceived Helpfulness of a Brief Intervention to Mitigate Future Suicide Risk.

Christa D Labouliere, Barbara Stanley, Alison M Lake, Madelyn S Gould

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04757649 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Suicide Prevention for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth (Case Series)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSan Diego State UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled9ConditionsSuicideArmsSafety Planning Intervention with Navigation Services
NCT05087966 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Suicide Prevention for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth (Open Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSan Diego State UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled31ConditionsSuicideArmsSafety Planning Intervention with Navigation Services
NCT05669976 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Suicide Prevention for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth (Randomized Controlled Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSan Diego State UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled170ConditionsSuicideArmsSafety Planning Intervention with Navigation Services, Safety Planning Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Clinical Perspective on Opioids in the Context of Suicide Risk.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2020
    Review
  13. Suicide Risk Assessment and Prevention: Challenges and Opportunities.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christa D LabouliereDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Barbara StanleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Alison M LakeNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Madelyn S GouldDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USNew York State Psychiatric Institute

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH114339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of crisis hotlines traditionally was limited to de-escalation and service linkage. However, hotlines are increasingly recruited to provide outreach and follow-up to suicidal individuals. Hotlines have the opportunity to not just defuse current crises but also provide brief interventions to mitigate future risk. The Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) is a brief intervention designed to help manage suicidal crises, but its feasibility and effectiveness on hotlines are not established.

aimsThis study examined feasibility and perceived effectiveness of SPI, as reported by 271 crisis counselors at five centers in the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline network.

methodCounselors were trained to use SPI. Self-report surveys were completed immediately after training (time 1) and at the end of the study, approximately 9 months later (time 2).

resultsCounselors reported that SPI was feasible and helpful, and was used on both incoming and follow-up calls. Utilization and perceived effectiveness at time 2 were predicted by self-efficacy, feasibility, and helpfulness at time 1. LIMITATIONS: Results are preliminary and limited to counselors' perceptions. Future RCTs should establish efficacy of SPI for crisis callers.

conclusionThe Safety Planning Intervention is a promising approach to reduce crisis callers' future suicide risk that hotline counselors report is both feasible and helpful.

Indexed as

CounselingHotlinesSuicidal IdeationSuicide PreventionCrisis InterventionFeasibility StudiesHumansSelf EfficacySelf ReportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31112330
PMCPMC7507118
OpenAlexW2945576454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.