Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31112295›Full record

ReviewActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2019

Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review.

Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Jeffrey T Jensen, Ilza Monteiro, Tina Peers, Maria Rodriguez, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Luis Bahamondes

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05655052 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Virtual Reality Glasses and Distraction Cards on Women's Pain, Anxiety and Satisfaction Level in Intrauterine Device Application'

TypeinterventionalSponsorMine Gokduman KelesRan2022 to 2023Enrolled37ConditionsVirtual Reality, Pain, Anxiety, Distraction CardsArmsVirtual Reality (VR) Group, Group using distraction cards
NCT07044622 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Intrauterine Device (IUD) Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsPainArmsTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Misoprostol for intrauterine device placement.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Pain at intrauterine device placement in a Brazilian center.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  5. Safety and efficacy of a suction cervical stabilizer for IUD insertion: Results from a multicenter post-marketing study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristina Gemzell-DanielssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, WHO-Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6516-1444
Jeffrey T JensenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Ilza MonteiroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Tina PeersClare Park Hospital, Farnham, UK.
Maria RodriguezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Attilio Di Spiezio SardoDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Luis BahamondesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 2013 review found no evidence to support the routine use of pain relief for intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) placement; however, fear of pain with placement continues to be a barrier to use for some women. This narrative review set out to identify (1) new evidence that may support routine use of pain management strategies for IUC placement; (2) procedure-related approaches that may have a positive impact on the pain experience; and (3) factors that may help healthcare professionals identify women at increased risk of pain with IUC placement. A literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane library databases revealed 550 citations, from which we identified 43 new and pertinent studies for review. Thirteen randomized clinical trials, published since 2012, described reductions in placement-related pain with administration of oral and local analgesia (oral ketorolac, local analgesia with different lidocaine formulations) and cervical priming when compared with placebo or controls. Four studies suggested that ultrasound guidance, balloon dilation, and a modified placement device may help to minimize the pain experienced with IUC placement. Eight publications suggested that previous cesarean delivery, timing of insertion relative to menstruation, dysmenorrhea, expected pain, baseline anxiety, and size of insertion tube may affect the pain experienced with IUC placement. Oral and local analgesia and cervical priming can be effective in minimizing IUC placement-related pain when compared with placebo, but routine use remains subject for debate. Predictive factors may help healthcare professionals to identify women at risk of experiencing pain. Targeted use of effective strategies in these women may be a useful approach while research continues in this area.

Indexed as

LidocaineAdministration, OralAnalgesicsAnesthesia, LocalFemaleHumansIntrauterine DevicesPainPain ManagementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsAnalgesicsLidocainecontraceptionintrauterine contraceptionintrauterine devicenonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugspainwomen

Identifiers

PMID31112295
PMCPMC6900125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.