Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31112280›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2019

Prospective Assessment of Cytomegalovirus Immunity in High-Risk Donor-Seropositive/Recipient-Seronegative Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Either Preemptive Therapy or Antiviral Prophylaxis.

Ajit P Limaye, Margaret L Green, Bradley C Edmison, Terry Stevens-Ayers, Sam Chatterton-Kirchmeier, Adam P Geballe, Nina Singh, Michael Boeckh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ajit P LimayeDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Margaret L GreenDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Bradley C EdmisonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle.
Terry Stevens-AyersFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle.
Sam Chatterton-KirchmeierFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle.
Adam P GeballeDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Nina SinghProgram in Infectious Diseases, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System and University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Michael BoeckhDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Mechanisms of Brain Dysmorphology in MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome, a Novel Intellectual Developmental Disability Disorder P50HD103524 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DANIEL DOHERTY · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOHERTY, DANIEL · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
Infections in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant RecipientsK24HL093294 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BOECKH, MICHAEL J · 2009 to 2019
$1.5M
CMV Entry-Specific Neutralizing Antibody in Primary Infection in TransplantationK23AI097234 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GREEN, MARGARET L · 2012 to 2016
$653k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL093294NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI097234NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103524NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differential impact of preemptive therapy (PET) and antiviral prophylaxis (AP) on development of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific neutralizing antibody (nAb) and T-cell responses have not previously been directly compared in high-risk donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+R-) organ transplant recipients. We prospectively assessed T-cell and nAb responses 3 months after transplantation in cohorts of high-risk D+R- liver transplant recipients who received either PET (n = 15) or AP (n = 25) and a control group of CMV-seropositive transplant recipients (R+) (AP; n = 24). CMV phosphoprotein 65 (pp65)- and immediate early protein 1-specific multifunctional T-cell responses were determined by means of intracellular cytokine staining and nAbs against BADrUL131-Y4 CMV in adult retinal pigment epithelial cell line-19 human epithelial cells; nAbs were detected in 8 of 12 (67%) in the PET group, none of 17 in the AP group, and 20 of 22 (91%) in the R+ group. Multifunctional CD8 and CD4 T-cell responses to pp65 were generally similar between PET and R+ groups, and lower for the AP group; multifunctional CD4 responses were similar across all groups. Among D+R- liver transplant recipients, PET was associated with the development of greater nAb and multifunctional CD8 T-cell responses compared with AP, providing a potential mechanism to explain the relative protection against late-onset disease with PET. Future studies are needed to define specific immune parameters predictive of late-onset CMV disease with AP.

Indexed as

ImmunityLiver TransplantationTransplant RecipientsAntiviral AgentsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell LineCytokinesCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsDrug Administration ScheduleEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntiviral AgentsCytokinesCytomegalovirusimmunitytransplant

Identifiers

PMID31112280
PMCPMC7325329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.