Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31112181›Full record

ReviewNatural product reports2019

Droplet probe: coupling chromatography to the in situ evaluation of the chemistry of nature.

Nicholas H Oberlies, Sonja L Knowles, Chiraz Soumia M Amrine, Diana Kao, Vilmos Kertesz, Huzefa A Raja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Natural product reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Metabolomics Applied to Cyanobacterial Toxins and Natural Products.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas H OberliesDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA. nicholas_oberlies@uncg.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0354-8464
Sonja L KnowlesDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA. nicholas_oberlies@uncg.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6295-231X
Chiraz Soumia M AmrineDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA. nicholas_oberlies@uncg.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7876-5244
Diana KaoDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA. nicholas_oberlies@uncg.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3889-6626
Vilmos KerteszMass Spectrometry and Laser Spectroscopy Group, Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-5797
Huzefa A RajaDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA. nicholas_oberlies@uncg.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0824-9463

Funding

Project 3:Isolation Chemistry of Filamentous Fungi and Biological EvaluationP01CA125066 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Alan Douglas Kinghorn · 2007 to 2026
$27.2M
Predoctoral Training: Innovative Technologies for Natural Products and Integrative Medicine ResearchT32AT008938 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO · PI Nadja B Cech, Jonathan Rodi Chekan · 2016 to 2026
$1.6M
Pursuing Antivirulence of MRSA in Penicillium sp. with droplet surface-sampling-liquid microjunction-probeF31AT009264 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO · PI KAO, DIANA · 2016 to 2018
$92k
NCCIH NIH HHS F31 AT009264NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT008938NCI NIH HHS P01 CA125066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covering: up to 2019The chemistry of nature can be beautiful, inspiring, beneficial and poisonous, depending on perspective. Since the isolation of the first secondary metabolites roughly two centuries ago, much of the chemical research on natural products has been both reductionist and static. Typically, compounds were isolated and characterized from the extract of an entire organism from a single time point. While there could be subtexts to that approach, the general premise has been to determine the chemistry with very little in the way of tools to differentiate spatial and/or temporal changes in secondary metabolite profiles. However, the past decade has seen exponential advances in our ability to observe, measure, and visualize the chemistry of nature in situ. Many of those techniques have been reviewed in this journal, and most are tapping into the power of mass spectrometry to analyze a plethora of sample types. In nearly all of the other techniques used to study chemistry in situ, the element of chromatography has been eliminated, instead using various ionization sources to coax ions of the secondary metabolites directly into the mass spectrometer as a mixture. Much of that science has been driven by the great advances in ambient ionization techniques used with a suite of mass spectrometry platforms, including the alphabet soup from DESI to LAESI to MALDI. This review discusses the one in situ analysis technique that incorporates chromatography, being the droplet-liquid microjunction-surface sampling probe, which is more easily termed "droplet probe". In addition to comparing and contrasting the droplet probe with other techniques, we provide perspective on why scientists, particularly those steeped in natural products chemistry training, may want to include chromatography in in situ analyses. Moreover, we provide justification for droplet sampling, especially for samples with delicate and/or non-uniform topographies. Furthermore, while the droplet probe has been used the most in the analysis of fungal cultures, we digest a variety of other applications, ranging from cyanobacteria, to plant parts, and even delicate documents, such as herbarium specimens.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesBiological ProductsChromatographyCoculture TechniquesCyanobacteriaFungiMass SpectrometryPlantsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID31112181
PMCPMC6640111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.