ArticleThe Journal of urology2019
Personalized Risks of Over Diagnosis for Screen Detected Prostate Cancer Incorporating Patient Comorbidities: Estimation and Communication.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of life expectancy on shared decision-making for prostate cancer screening.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Lived Experience of Men with Prostate Cancer in Ireland: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prostate Cancer-Research Advances in Early Detection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Prostate Cancer Mortality in Men Aged 70 Years Who Recently Underwent Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The epidemiology, etiology, and future prophylactic options for cancers in Mainland China.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Role of Systematic Biopsy in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Lifetime Health and Economic Outcomes of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as First-Line Screening for Prostate Cancer : A Decision Model Analysis.Annals of internal medicine · 2024Article
- Decision regret after prostate biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: a Korean multicenter cohort study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Frequency of Guideline-Discordant Prostate Cancer Screening Among Older Males.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Article
- Prostate cancer screening in African American men: a review of the evidence.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Review
- The Risk Factors and Screening Uptake for Prostate Cancer: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- MRI-Guided Targeted and Systematic Prostate Biopsies as Prognostic Indicators for Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions.Cancers · 2023Article
- Reducing Prostate Cancer Overdiagnosis.The New England journal of medicine · 2022Article
- The Impact of Intensifying Prostate Cancer Screening in Black Men: A Model-Based Analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Article
- When to Discuss Prostate Cancer Screening With Average-Risk Men.American journal of preventive medicine · 2021Article
- The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020Article
- Metastatic Spread in Prostate Cancer Patients Influencing Radiotherapy Response.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeShared patient-physician decision making regarding the treatment of prostate cancer detected by prostate specific antigen screening involves a complex calculus weighing cancer risk and patient life expectancy. We sought to quantify these competing risks using the probability that the cancer was over diagnosed, ie would not have been clinically diagnosed (diagnosed without screening) during the remaining lifetime of the patient. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing an established model of prostate cancer screening and clinical diagnosis we simulated screen detected cases and determined whether a modeled clinical diagnosis would occur before noncancer death. Time of noncancer death was based on comorbidity adjusted population lifetables. Logistic regression models were fitted to the simulated data and used to estimate over diagnosis probabilities given patient age, prostate specific antigen level, Gleason sum and comorbidity category. An online calculator was developed to communicate over diagnosis estimates. Face validity and ease of use were assessed by surveying 32 clinical experts.
resultsEstimated probabilities of over diagnosis ranged from 4% to 78% across clinicopathological variables and comorbidity status. When ignoring comorbidity, the estimated probability of over diagnosis in a 70-year-old man with prostate specific antigen 9.4 ng/ml and Gleason 6 was 34%. With severe comorbidities the estimate increased to 51%. Such a personalization may help inform the choice between active surveillance and definitive treatment. Based on responses from 20 of 32 experts we modified the explanation of over diagnosis for the online calculator and the input method for comorbid conditions.
conclusionsThe probability of over diagnosis is strongly influenced by comorbidity status in addition to age. Personalized estimates incorporating comorbidity may contribute to shared decision making between patients and providers regarding personalized treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.