Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31111962›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

Robust contour propagation using deep learning and image registration for online adaptive proton therapy of prostate cancer.

Mohamed S Elmahdy, Thyrza Jagt, Roel Th Zinkstok, Yuchuan Qiao, Rahil Shahzad, Hessam Sokooti, Sahar Yousefi, Luca Incrocci, C A M Marijnen, Mischa Hoogeman and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recent advances in applying machine learning to proton radiotherapy.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Real-Time Dose-Guided Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Unsupervised Contour Tracking of Live Cells by Mechanical and Cycle Consistency Losses.Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Outbreak COVID-19 in Medical Image Processing Using Deep Learning: A State-of-the-Art Review.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed S ElmahdyDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300, RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Thyrza JagtErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Roel Th ZinkstokDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300, RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Yuchuan QiaoDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300, RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rahil ShahzadDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300, RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hessam SokootiDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300, RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sahar YousefiDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300, RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Luca IncrocciErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
C A M MarijnenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300, RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mischa HoogemanErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marius StaringDivision of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300, RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLDelft University of Technology · NL

Funding

Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development 104003012Varian Medical SystemsZonMw
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and validate a robust and accurate registration pipeline for automatic contour propagation for online adaptive Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) of prostate cancer using elastix software and deep learning.

methodsA three-dimensional (3D) Convolutional Neural Network was trained for automatic bladder segmentation of the computed tomography (CT) scans. The automatic bladder segmentation alongside the computed tomography (CT) scan is jointly optimized to add explicit knowledge about the underlying anatomy to the registration algorithm. We included three datasets from different institutes and CT manufacturers. The first was used for training and testing the ConvNet, where the second and the third were used for evaluation of the proposed pipeline. The system performance was quantified geometrically using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the mean surface distance (MSD), and the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD). The propagated contours were validated clinically through generating the associated IMPT plans and compare it with the IMPT plans based on the manual delineations. Propagated contours were considered clinically acceptable if their treatment plans met the dosimetric coverage constraints on the manual contours.

resultsThe bladder segmentation network achieved a DSC of 88% and 82% on the test datasets. The proposed registration pipeline achieved a MSD of 1.29 ± 0.39, 1.48 ± 1.16, and 1.49 ± 0.44 mm for the prostate, seminal vesicles, and lymph nodes, respectively, on the second dataset and a MSD of 2.31 ± 1.92 and 1.76 ± 1.39 mm for the prostate and seminal vesicles on the third dataset. The automatically propagated contours met the dose coverage constraints in 86%, 91%, and 99% of the cases for the prostate, seminal vesicles, and lymph nodes, respectively. A Conservative Success Rate (CSR) of 80% was obtained, compared to 65% when only using intensity-based registration.

conclusionThe proposed registration pipeline obtained highly promising results for generating treatment plans adapted to the daily anatomy. With 80% of the automatically generated treatment plans directly usable without manual correction, a substantial improvement in system robustness was reached compared to a previous approach. The proposed method therefore facilitates more precise proton therapy of prostate cancer, potentially leading to fewer treatment-related adverse side effects.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProton TherapyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRadiometryRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedconvolutional neural networks (CNN)deformable image registrationdistended rectumgenerative adversarial network (GAN)prostate cancerproton therapy

Identifiers

PMID31111962
PMCPMC6852565
OpenAlexW2945991555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.