ArticleMedical physics2019
Robust contour propagation using deep learning and image registration for online adaptive proton therapy of prostate cancer.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in applying machine learning to proton radiotherapy.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2025Pooled it
- Real-Time Dose-Guided Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Review
- Proposal for a Method for Assessing the Quality of an Updated Deep Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation Program.Cureus · 2025Article
- First-in-Men Online Adaptive Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Toward Ultrahypofractionation for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- A retrospective study on the investigation of potential dosimetric benefits of online adaptive proton therapy for head and neck cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Review and recommendations on deformable image registration uncertainties for radiotherapy applications.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Review
- Article
- Progressively refined deep joint registration segmentation (ProRSeg) of gastrointestinal organs at risk: Application to MRI and cone-beam CT.Medical physics · 2023Article
- An Unsupervised Learning-Based Regional Deformable Model for Automated Multi-Organ Contour Propagation.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Unsupervised Contour Tracking of Live Cells by Mechanical and Cycle Consistency Losses.Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2023Article
- Online adaptive planning methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Review
- A probabilistic deep learning model of inter-fraction anatomical variations in radiotherapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans.Cancers · 2022Article
- Patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Unsupervised Image Registration towards Enhancing Performance and Explainability in Cardiac and Brain Image Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- One shot PACS: Patient specific Anatomic Context and Shape prior aware recurrent registration-segmentation of longitudinal thoracic cone beam CTs.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2022Article
- Deep learning-based segmentation of the thorax in mouse micro-CT scans.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Outbreak COVID-19 in Medical Image Processing Using Deep Learning: A State-of-the-Art Review.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2022Review
- Management of Motion and Anatomical Variations in Charged Particle Therapy: Past, Present, and Into the Future.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and validate a robust and accurate registration pipeline for automatic contour propagation for online adaptive Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) of prostate cancer using elastix software and deep learning.
methodsA three-dimensional (3D) Convolutional Neural Network was trained for automatic bladder segmentation of the computed tomography (CT) scans. The automatic bladder segmentation alongside the computed tomography (CT) scan is jointly optimized to add explicit knowledge about the underlying anatomy to the registration algorithm. We included three datasets from different institutes and CT manufacturers. The first was used for training and testing the ConvNet, where the second and the third were used for evaluation of the proposed pipeline. The system performance was quantified geometrically using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the mean surface distance (MSD), and the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD). The propagated contours were validated clinically through generating the associated IMPT plans and compare it with the IMPT plans based on the manual delineations. Propagated contours were considered clinically acceptable if their treatment plans met the dosimetric coverage constraints on the manual contours.
resultsThe bladder segmentation network achieved a DSC of 88% and 82% on the test datasets. The proposed registration pipeline achieved a MSD of 1.29 ± 0.39, 1.48 ± 1.16, and 1.49 ± 0.44 mm for the prostate, seminal vesicles, and lymph nodes, respectively, on the second dataset and a MSD of 2.31 ± 1.92 and 1.76 ± 1.39 mm for the prostate and seminal vesicles on the third dataset. The automatically propagated contours met the dose coverage constraints in 86%, 91%, and 99% of the cases for the prostate, seminal vesicles, and lymph nodes, respectively. A Conservative Success Rate (CSR) of 80% was obtained, compared to 65% when only using intensity-based registration.
conclusionThe proposed registration pipeline obtained highly promising results for generating treatment plans adapted to the daily anatomy. With 80% of the automatically generated treatment plans directly usable without manual correction, a substantial improvement in system robustness was reached compared to a previous approach. The proposed method therefore facilitates more precise proton therapy of prostate cancer, potentially leading to fewer treatment-related adverse side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.