Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31111946›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2019

Clinical experience of craniospinal intensity-modulated spot-scanning proton therapy using large fields for central nervous system medulloblastomas and germ cell tumors in children, adolescents, and young adults.

Takayuki Hashimoto, Shinichi Shimizu, Seishin Takao, Shunsuke Terasaka, Akihiro Iguchi, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Takashi Mori, Takaaki Yoshimura, Yuto Matsuo, Masaya Tamura and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Takayuki HashimotoDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University.
Shinichi ShimizuGlobal Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University.
Seishin TakaoGlobal Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University.
Shunsuke TerasakaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University.
Akihiro IguchiDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University.
Hiroyuki KobayashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University.
Takashi MoriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital.
Takaaki YoshimuraProton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital.
Yuto MatsuoProton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital.
Masaya TamuraDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University.
Taeko MatsuuraGlobal Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University.
Yoichi M ItoDepartment of Statistical Data Science, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics.
Rikiya OnimaruDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University.
Hiroki ShiratoDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University.
Hokkaido University · JPProton (Malaysia) · MYHokkaido University Hospital · JPThe Institute of Statistical Mathematics · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outcomes of intensity-modulated proton craniospinal irradiation (ipCSI) are unclear. We evaluated the clinical benefit of our newly developed ipCSI system that incorporates two gantry-mounted orthogonal online X-ray imagers with a robotic six-degrees-of-freedom patient table. Nine patients (7-19 years old) were treated with ipCSI. The prescribed dose for CSI ranged from 23.4 to 36.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 13-20 fractions. Four adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients (15 years or older) were treated with vertebral-body-sparing ipCSI (VBSipCSI). Myelosuppression following VBSipCSI was compared with that of eight AYA patients treated with photon CSI at the same institution previously. The mean homogeneity index (HI) in the nine patients was 0.056 (95% confidence interval: 0.044-0.068). The mean time from the start to the end of all beam delivery was 37 min 39 s ± 2 min 24 s (minimum to maximum: 22 min 49 s - 42 min 51 s). The nadir white blood cell, hemoglobin, and platelet levels during the 4 weeks following the end of the CSI were significantly higher in the VBSipCSI group than in the photon CSI group (P = 0.0071, 0.0453, 0.0024, respectively). The levels at 4 weeks after the end of CSI were significantly higher in the VBSipCSI group than in the photon CSI group (P = 0.0023, 0.0414, 0.0061). Image-guided ipCSI was deliverable in a reasonable time with sufficient HI. Using VBSipCSI, AYA patients experienced a lower incidence of serious acute hematological toxicity than AYA patients treated with photon CSI.

Indexed as

Proton TherapyAdolescentCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChildCraniospinal IrradiationFemaleHumansMaleMedulloblastomaNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalPhotonsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRelative Biological EffectivenessReproducibility of Resultsadolescents and young adultsbeam delivery timecraniospinal irradiationhematologic toxicityintensity-modulated spot-scanning proton therapyvertebral body sparing

Identifiers

PMID31111946
PMCPMC6640905
OpenAlexW2945699170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.