Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31111890›Full record

Observational studyHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2019

Low prevalence of male microchimerism in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

H E Peters, B N Johnson, E A Ehli, D Micha, M O Verhoeven, G E Davies, J J M L Dekker, A Overbeek, M H van den Berg, E van Dulmen-den Broeder and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

H E PetersDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
B N JohnsonAvera Institute for Human Genetics, Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
E A EhliAvera Institute for Human Genetics, Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
D MichaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M O VerhoevenDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
G E DaviesAvera Institute for Human Genetics, Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
J J M L DekkerDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A OverbeekDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M H van den BergDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Oncology/Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
E van Dulmen-den BroederDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Oncology/Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
F E van LeeuwenDepartment of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
V MijatovicDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
D I BoomsmaDepartment of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C B LambalkDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAvera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center · USOncode Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionIs there an increased prevalence of male microchimerism in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, as evidence of fetal exposure to blood and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) from a (vanished) male co-twin resulting in regression of the Müllerian duct derivatives? SUMMARY ANSWER: Predominant absence of male microchimerism in adult women with MRKH syndrome does not support our hypothesis that intrauterine blood exchange with a (vanished) male co-twin is the pathophysiological mechanism. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The etiology of MRKH is unclear. Research on the phenotype analogous condition in cattle (freemartinism) has yielded the hypothesis that Müllerian duct development is inhibited by exposure to AMH in utero. In cattle, the male co-twin has been identified as the source for AMH, which is transferred via placental blood exchange. In human twins, a similar exchange of cellular material has been documented by detection of chimerism, but it is unknown whether this has clinical consequences. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: An observational case-control study was performed to compare the presence of male microchimerism in women with MRKH syndrome and control women. Through recruitment via the Dutch patients' association of women with MRKH (comprising 300 members who were informed by email or regular mail), we enrolled 96 patients between January 2017 and July 2017. The control group consisted of 100 women who reported never having been pregnant. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsAfter written informed consent, peripheral blood samples were obtained by venipuncture, and genomic DNA was extracted. Male microchimerism was detected by Y-chromosome-specific real-time quantitative PCR, with use of DYS14 marker. Possible other sources for microchimerism, for example older brothers, were evaluated using questionnaire data. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The final analysis included 194 women: 95 women with MRKH syndrome with a mean age of 40.9 years and 99 control women with a mean age of 30.2 years. In total, 54 women (56.8%) were identified as having typical MRKH syndrome, and 41 women (43.2%) were identified as having atypical MRKH syndrome (when extra-genital malformations were present). The prevalence of male microchimerism was significantly higher in the control group than in the MRKH group (17.2% versus 5.3%, P = 0.009). After correcting for age, women in the control group were 5.8 times more likely to have male microchimerism (odds ratio 5.84 (CI 1.59-21.47), P = 0.008). The mean concentration of male microchimerism in the positive samples was 56.0 male genome equivalent per 1 000 000 cells. The prevalence of male microchimerism was similar in women with typical MRKH syndrome and atypical MRKH syndrome (5.6% versus 4.9%, P = 0.884). There were no differences between women with or without microchimerism in occurrence of alternative sources of XY cells, such as older brothers, previous blood transfusion, or history of sexual intercourse. LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: We are not able to draw definitive conclusions regarding the occurrence of AMH exchange during embryologic development in women with MRKH syndrome. Our subject population includes all adult women and therefore is reliant on long-term prevalence of microchimerism. Moreover, we have only tested blood, and, theoretically, the cells may have grafted anywhere in the body during development. It must also be considered that the exchange of AMH may occur without the transfusion of XY cells and therefore cannot be discovered by chimerism detection. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThis is the first study to test the theory that freemartinism causes the MRKH syndrome in humans. The study aimed to test the presence of male microchimerism in women with MRKH syndrome as a reflection of early fetal exposure to blood and AMH from a male (vanished) co-twin. We found that male microchimerism was only present in 5.3% of the women with MRKH syndrome, a significantly lower percentage than in the control group (17.2%). Our results do not provide evidence for an increased male microchimerism in adult women with MRKH as a product of intrauterine blood exchange. However, the significant difference in favor of the control group is of interest to the ongoing discussion on microchimeric cell transfer and the possible sources of XY cells. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch trial register, NTR5961.

Indexed as

Chimerism46, XX Disorders of Sex DevelopmentAdultBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCongenital AbnormalitiesFemaleGenes, Y-LinkedHumansMiddle AgedMullerian DuctsPrevalenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionYoung AdultBiomarkersetiologyfreemartinismMayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndromemicrochimerismMüllerian aplasia

Identifiers

PMID31111890
PMCPMC6554047
OpenAlexW2946569296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.