ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2019
Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07611448 (An Observational Study of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Blastocyst Morphokinetic Analysis Using Short-Duration Video and Its Association With Pregnancy Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 122 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Observational Study of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Blastocyst Morphokinetic Analysis Using Short-Duration Video and Its Association With Pregnancy Outcomes
Who cites it
122 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep learning applications for human embryo assessment using time-lapse imaging: scoping review.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- Contributions of Artificial Intelligence Reported in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Towards deep phenotyping pregnancy: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and machine learning methods to improve pregnancy outcomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Pooled it
- Deep learning versus manual morphology-based embryo selection in IVF: a randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial.Nature medicine · 2024Trial
- A double-blind randomized controlled trial investigating a time-lapse algorithm for selecting Day 5 blastocysts for transfer.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Trial
- Automated precise recognition of ovine embryo microscopic images using a boundary-enhanced deep learning network.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Article
- Current state of artificial intelligence applications in assisted reproductive technology: A narrative review.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- From time-lapse to morphokinetics: neural ODE dynamics for reliable embryo stage transition timing.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- An Optimal Approach in Selecting Embryo for In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Based on Deep Learning.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026Article
- Automation in the IVF laboratory in 2026: four technology domains, an asymmetric evidence base, and the case for parallel development with clinician-side automation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Automation, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Digital Management in IVF Laboratories: Current Status, Challenges and Potential.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Automated Cytoplasmic Image Analysis System for Non-invasive Oocyte Quality Screening Workflow Using Static Bright-Field Images.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Article
- PGT-A reveals triploid embryos among normally fertilized oocytes: frequency and blastocyst features.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Alignment among the zygotic cleavage plane, pronuclear axis, and polar axis predicts live birth outcome of blastocyst.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in infertility treatment: Applications, challenges, and future directions: A narrative review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2026Review
- Evaluating the concordance between AI-based and conventional embryo selection: implications for clinical decision-making.Reproductive biomedicine online · 2026Article
- Embryo metabolite analysis and implantation potential prediction using chemiluminescent microfluidic chips with dielectric wetting valves.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Exploring the increasing aneuploidy stress effects on embryo morphokinetic development: non-linear and stage-specific disruption in developmental timing.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- AI prediction models based on time-lapse imaging for good embryos with implantation potential and euploidy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal intelligent prediction model for in vitro fertilization.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionCan a deep learning model predict the probability of pregnancy with fetal heart (FH) from time-lapse videos? SUMMARY ANSWER: We created a deep learning model named IVY, which was an objective and fully automated system that predicts the probability of FH pregnancy directly from raw time-lapse videos without the need for any manual morphokinetic annotation or blastocyst morphology assessment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The contribution of time-lapse imaging in effective embryo selection is promising. Existing algorithms for the analysis of time-lapse imaging are based on morphology and morphokinetic parameters that require subjective human annotation and thus have intrinsic inter-reader and intra-reader variability. Deep learning offers promise for the automation and standardization of embryo selection. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective analysis of time-lapse videos and clinical outcomes of 10 638 embryos from eight different IVF clinics, across four different countries, between January 2014 and December 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsThe deep learning model was trained using time-lapse videos with known FH pregnancy outcome to perform a binary classification task of predicting the probability of pregnancy with FH given time-lapse video sequence. The predictive power of the model was measured using the average area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve over 5-fold stratified cross-validation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The deep learning model was able to predict FH pregnancy from time-lapse videos with an AUC of 0.93 [95% CI 0.92-0.94] in 5-fold stratified cross-validation. A hold-out validation test across eight laboratories showed that the AUC was reproducible, ranging from 0.95 to 0.90 across different laboratories with different culture and laboratory processes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is a retrospective analysis demonstrating that the deep learning model has a high level of predictability of the likelihood that an embryo will implant. The clinical impacts of these findings are still uncertain. Further studies, including prospective randomized controlled trials, are required to evaluate the clinical significance of this deep learning model. The time-lapse videos collected for training and validation are Day 5 embryos; hence, additional adjustment would need to be made for the model to be used in the context of Day 3 transfer. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThe high predictive value for embryo implantation obtained by the deep learning model may improve the effectiveness of previous approaches used for time-lapse imaging in embryo selection. This may improve the prioritization of the most viable embryo for a single embryo transfer. The deep learning model may also prove to be useful in providing the optimal order for subsequent transfers of cryopreserved embryos. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): D.T. is the co-owner of Harrison AI that has patented this methodology in association with Virtus Health. P.I. is a shareholder in Virtus Health. S.C., P.I. and D.G. are all either employees or contracted with Virtus Health. D.G. has received grant support from Vitrolife, the manufacturer of the Embryoscope time-lapse imaging used in this study. The equipment and time for this study have been jointly provided by Harrison AI and Virtus Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.