Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31111684›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Suboptimal geographic accessibility to comprehensive HIV care in the US: regional and urban-rural differences.

Steven P Masiano, Erika G Martin, Rose S Bono, Bassam Dahman, Lindsay M Sabik, Faye Z Belgrave, Adaora A Adimora, April D Kimmel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Transit Accessibility and Engagement in HIV Care in Baltimore, Maryland.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brief Report: Availability of Substance Use Services at US HIV Care Facilities by Urbanicity.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steven P MasianoDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Erika G MartinDepartment of Public Administration and Policy, University at Albany-State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.
Rose S BonoDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Bassam DahmanDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Lindsay M SabikDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Faye Z BelgraveDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Adaora A AdimoraDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
April D KimmelDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3966-8476

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health Related ResearchUL1TR002649 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2018 to 2022
$19.1M
Training Program for Scientists Conducting Research to Reduce HIV Health DisparitR25MH067127 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Emily A Arnold, Torsten Brian Neilands · 2003 to 2026
$5.4M
Minority Populations Prevention Researcher TrainingR25HD045810 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NEILANDS, TORSTEN BRIAN · 2003 to 2018
$4.3M
Delivering High-Quality HIV Care in the South: System-Level Policy AlternativesR01MD011277 · NIMHD · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KIMMEL, APRIL D · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchKL2TR000057 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2012 to 2014
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000057NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002649NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD045810NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011277NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH067127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving US state and municipal benchmarks to end the HIV epidemic and promote health equity requires access to comprehensive HIV care. However, this care may not be geographically accessible for all people living with HIV (PLHIV). We estimated county-level drive time and suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care across the contiguous US, assessing regional and urban-rural differences. We integrated publicly available data from four federal databases to identify and geocode sites providing comprehensive HIV care in 2015, defined as the co-located provision of core HIV medical care and support services. Leveraging street network, US Census and HIV surveillance data (2014), we used geographic analysis to estimate the fastest one-way drive time between the population-weighted county centroid and the nearest site providing HIV care for counties reporting at least five diagnosed HIV cases. We summarized HIV care sites, county-level drive time, population-weighted drive time and suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care, by US region and county rurality (2013). Geographic accessibility to HIV care was suboptimal if drive time was >30 min, a common threshold for primary care accessibility in the general US population. Tests of statistical significance were not performed, since the analysis is population-based. We identified 671 HIV care sites across the US, with 95% in urban counties. Nationwide, the median county-level drive time to HIV care is 69 min (interquartile range (IQR) 66 min). The median county-level drive time to HIV care for rural counties (90 min, IQR 61) is over twice that of urban counties (40 min, IQR 48), with the greatest urban-rural differences in the West. Nationally, population-weighted drive time, an approximation of individual-level drive time, is over five times longer in rural counties than in urban counties. Geographic access to HIV care is suboptimal for over 170,000 people diagnosed with HIV (19%), with over half of these individuals from the South and disproportionately the rural South. Nationally, approximately 80,000 (9%) drive over an hour to receive HIV care. Suboptimal geographic accessibility to HIV care is an important structural barrier in the US, particularly for rural residents living with HIV in the South and West. Targeted policies and interventions to address this challenge should become a priority.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdolescentAdultDatabases, FactualGeography, MedicalHIV InfectionsHumansPrimary Health CareRural PopulationUnited Statesaccess to caredisparitiesgeographyHIV/AIDSruraltravel time

Identifiers

PMID31111684
PMCPMC6527947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.