ArticleEndocrine2019
Comparison of strategies for setting intervention thresholds for Chinese postmenopausal women using the FRAX model.
Article in Endocrine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Interpretation of 2024 United Kingdom National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) Clinical Guidelines: Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Risk factors in elderly female patients for refracture within two years following surgery for fragility fractures: a prospective observational study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Observational
- Association between bone turnover markers and FRAX predicted fracture risk in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Construction and verification of risk prediction model of osteoporotic fractures in patients with osteoporosis in China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Fracture risk prediction in old Chinese people-a narrative review.Archives of osteoporosis · 2023Review
- Setting the new FRAX reference threshold without bone mineral density in Chinese postmenopausal women.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2021Article
- Liraglutide Promotes Osteoblastic Differentiation in MC3T3-E1 Cells by ERK5 Pathway.International journal of endocrinology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe two main strategies for managing osteoporosis using the Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX®) are the fixed-probability threshold of the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) and the age-dependent-probability threshold of the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG), but there are no FRAX® Chinese-specific thresholds. This study examined the NOF and NOGG strategies for intervention thresholds using the Chinese FRAX® model for their appropriateness for Chinese postmenopausal women, and explored Chinese-specific thresholds.
methodsPostmenopausal women (N = 264) >50 years old from community-medical centers in China were randomly selected. They completed a self-report questionnaire and underwent bone mineral density measurements and spinal X-rays. The 10-year risks for a major osteoporosis fracture and hip fracture were calculated using the Chinese FRAX® model. Using an osteoporosis diagnosis as the gold standard, we compared the abilities of the NOF and NOGG thresholds to detect osteoporosis by analyzing their sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios.
resultsThe 10-year risks for hip fracture and a major osteoporotic fracture increased with age. The NOF's accuracy in detecting osteoporosis was 83.33% and the NOGG's was 74.24%. The NOF thresholds showed higher accuracy and specificity than the NOGG thresholds.
conclusionNOF thresholds are more appropriate for Chinese menopausal women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31111436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.