Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31111426›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2020

An Examination of Lymph Node Sampling as a Predictor of Survival in Resected Node-Negative Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: a SEER Database Analysis.

Maclean Thiessen, R M Lee-Ying, J G Monzon, P A Tang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maclean ThiessenDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Maclean.thiessen@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2460-5608
R M Lee-YingDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J G MonzonDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
P A TangDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare disease. Current recommendations are largely extrapolated from the colorectal literature. For node-negative (N -ve) cases, optimally stratifying cases into high or low risk, may help define optimal management. The objective of this analysis was to determine the importance of lymph node sampling for prognostication and to define what number of lymph nodes sampled is adequate.

methodsCases of non-metastatic SBA with complete staging, pathologic, and demographic information were selected from the SEER database and SAS 9.4 software was used. Variables included age, gender, race, grade, TNM staging, and number of lymph nodes were examined. Comparisons were made between N -ve and N +ve cases. Survival analysis using N -ve cases was performed to characterize the impact of nodal sampling on survival and to determine which nodal cut-offs best predict survival.

resultsA total of 523 cases from 2004 to 2014 were included in this analysis. Statistically significant differences identified included the median number of nodes sampled between the N -ve and N +ve groups, and the distribution of T stage and grade. Survival analysis in the N -ve cases demonstrated that the strongest predictor of survival was sampling of 16 or more lymph nodes.

conclusionIn this analysis, lymph node sampling was shown to be the most important pathologic predictor of survival in cases of N -ve SBA. Replicating these findings in a secondary dataset and determining whether a clinical benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy exists for SBA patients with inadequate sampling are both important next steps.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaDuodenal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIleal NeoplasmsIntestine, SmallJejunal NeoplasmsLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramAdenocarcinomaAdjuvantEpidemiologyPrognosticRare cancersRetrospectiveRisk stratificationSEERSmall bowelSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID31111426
OpenAlexW2945151273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.