Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31111391›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Combined effects of carbonaceous-immobilizing agents and subsequent sulphur application on maize phytoextraction efficiency in highly contaminated soil.

Stanislava Kroulíková, Sascha Mohnke, Walter W Wenzel, Václav Tejnecký, Jiřina Száková, Filip Mercl, Pavel Tlustoš

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stanislava KroulíkováDepartment of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CULS), Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic. kroulikova@af.czu.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3178-5835
Sascha MohnkeDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Konrad Lorenz Straße 24, 3430, Tulln, Austria.
Walter W WenzelDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Konrad Lorenz Straße 24, 3430, Tulln, Austria.
Václav TejneckýDepartment of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CULS), Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiřina SzákováDepartment of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CULS), Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Filip MerclDepartment of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CULS), Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel TlustošDepartment of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CULS), Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZBOKU University · AT

Funding

European Regional Development Fund No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The establishment of phytoextraction crops on highly contaminated soils can be limited by metal toxicity. A recent proposal has suggested establishing support crops during the critical initial phase by metal immobilization through soil amendments followed by subsequent mobilization using elemental sulphur to enhance phytoextraction efficiency. This 'combined phytoremediation' approach is tested for the first time in a pot experiment with a highly contaminated soil. During a 14-week period, relatively metal-tolerant maize was grown in a greenhouse under immobilization (before sulphur (S) application) and mobilization (after S application) conditions with soil containing Cd, Pb and Zn contaminants. Apart from the control (C) sample, the soil was amended with activated carbon (AC), lignite (Lig) or vermicompost (VC) all in two different doses (dose 1~45 g additive kg

Indexed as

SulfurBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiological AvailabilityBiomassCharcoalCompostingEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationMetals, HeavyPhosphorusPlant ShootsSoilSoil PollutantsZea maysCharcoalMetals, HeavyPhosphorusSoilSoil PollutantsSulfurActivated carbonHeavy metalsLigniteVermicompostZea mays

Identifiers

PMID31111391
OpenAlexW2945438831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.