Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31111275›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2019

KRAS status is related to histological phenotype in gastric cancer: results from a large multicentre study.

Lindsay C Hewitt, Yuichi Saito, Tan Wang, Yoko Matsuda, Jan Oosting, Arnaldo N S Silva, Hayley L Slaney, Veerle Melotte, Gordon Hutchins, Patrick Tan and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The relationship between the gastric cancer microbiome and clinicopathological factors: a metagenomic investigation from the 100,000 genomes project and The Cancer Genome Atlas.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The dawn of precision medicine in diffuse-type gastric cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lindsay C HewittDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Yuichi SaitoDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tan WangDepartment of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoko MatsudaDepartment of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Jan OostingDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arnaldo N S SilvaDivision of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Hayley L SlaneyDivision of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Veerle MelotteDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gordon HutchinsDivision of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Patrick TanDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Takaki YoshikawaDepartment of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomio AraiDepartment of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Heike I GrabschDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands. H.Grabsch@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9520-6228

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP16K08664Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP25460428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer (GC) is histologically a very heterogeneous disease, and the temporal development of different histological phenotypes remains unclear. Recent studies in lung and ovarian cancer suggest that KRAS activation (KRASact) can influence histological phenotype. KRASact likely results from KRAS mutation (KRASmut) or KRAS amplification (KRASamp). The aim of the study was to investigate whether KRASmut and/or KRASamp are related to the histological phenotype in GC.

methodsDigitized haematoxylin/eosin-stained slides from 1282 GC resection specimens were classified according to Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) and the Lauren classification by at least two observers. The relationship between KRAS status, predominant histological phenotype and clinicopathological variables was assessed.

resultsKRASmut and KRASamp were found in 68 (5%) and 47 (7%) GCs, respectively. Within the KRASmut and KRASamp cases, the most frequent GC histological phenotype was moderately differentiated tubular 2 (tub2) type (KRASmut: n = 27, 40%; KRASamp: n = 21, 46%) or intestinal type (KRASmut: n = 41, 61%; KRASamp: n = 23, 50%). Comparing individual histological subtypes, mucinous carcinoma displayed the highest frequency of KRASmut (JGCA: n = 6, 12%, p = 0.012; Lauren: n = 6, 12%, p = 0.013), and KRASamp was more frequently found in poorly differentiated solid type (n = 12, 10%, p = 0.267) or indeterminate type (n = 12, 10%, p = 0.480) GC. 724 GCs (57%) had intratumour morphological heterogeneity.

conclusionsThis is the largest GC study investigating KRAS status and histological phenotype. We identified a relationship between KRASmut and mucinous phenotype. The high level of intratumour morphological heterogeneity could reflect KRASmut heterogeneity, which may explain the failure of anti-EGFR therapy in GC.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPhenotypeProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsYoung AdultKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)AmplificationGastric cancerHistological phenotypeKRASMutation

Identifiers

PMID31111275
PMCPMC6811379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.