Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31111230›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2019

Surgical Training in South Africa: An Overview and Attempt to Assess the Training System from the Perspective of Foreign Trainees.

Guglielmo Mantica, Pietro Fransvea, Francesco Virdis, Timothy C Hardcastle, Hilgard Ackermann, Carlo Terrone, Gianluca Costa, André Van der Merwe, Genoveffa Balducci, Elmin Steyn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Guglielmo ManticaDepartment of Urology, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Pietro FransveaTrauma Unit, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Pietro.fransvea@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4969-3373
Francesco VirdisGeneral Surgery and Colorectal Unit Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust London, London, UK.
Timothy C HardcastleDepartment Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Hilgard AckermannDepartment of Urology, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Carlo TerroneDepartment of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Gianluca CostaSurgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sant' Andrea Teaching Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
André Van der MerweDepartment of Urology, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Genoveffa BalducciSurgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sant' Andrea Teaching Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Elmin SteynTrauma Unit, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZAAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITHillingdon Hospital · GBOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, there are no objective reports evaluating the quality of the South African surgical training. The aim of this study is to evaluate the current state of surgical training in South Africa from an external impartial point of view and to rate the experience of short-term supernumerary registrars and fellows (STSRF) within the South African training system.

methodsA 29-item survey was distributed via e-mail and social media to non-South African trainees who worked in South Africa as STSRF for a period of at least 1 month during the past 5 years. The survey evaluated the surgical, clinical and academic training received during their elective period in a South African department.

resultsSixty-four STSRF replied to the survey. Sixty-two percent of STSRF attended a trauma unit during their experience. For the majority of respondents, open and emergency surgical exposure, as well as experience as first surgeon, is significantly higher in the South African system, while minimally invasive and endoscopic surgery exposure is significantly less. Research project involvement is significantly less, for the STSRF, as opposed to lectures and teaching that constitute a higher percentage. No significant difference was found regarding exposure to hands-on activities.

conclusionsThe South African system still provides excellent surgical and clinical exposure as well as teaching. However, minimally invasive surgery training and research are generally lacking for the STSRF. Exchange programs between South African and developed country institutes should be improved and encouraged in order to gain mutual benefits.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleForeign Medical GraduatesHumansMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSouth AfricaSurgical Procedures, OperativeSurveys and QuestionnairesTrauma Centers

Identifiers

PMID31111230
OpenAlexW2945995360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.