Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31111209›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Development and clinical outcomes of an endoscopic submucosal dissection fellowship program: early united states experience.

Phillip S Ge, Christopher C Thompson, Hiroyuki Aihara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Double-tunneling butterfly method for endoscopic submucosal dissection of extensive rectal neoplasms.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Phillip S GeDevelopmental Endoscopy Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher C ThompsonDevelopmental Endoscopy Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Hiroyuki AiharaDevelopmental Endoscopy Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. haihara@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsAdoption of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the USA is challenging due to limited training opportunities. We describe the development of an ESD fellowship program in the USA and evaluate outcomes of ESD performed during this experience.

methodsA 1-year ESD fellowship was implemented under close supervision from a recognized ESD expert. The curriculum was tailored to the trainee based on their background and prior endoscopic training. Under the expert's discretion, the trainee started by assisting cases and was gradually allowed to begin performing portions of ESD, with increasing difficulty as determined by technical progress, until complete procedures could be performed. Technical characteristics, outcomes, and adverse events were recorded.

resultsA total of 72 consecutive ESD cases were performed during the training period, in which the trainee assisted/observed 19 cases, partially performed 18 cases, and mainly performed 26 cases. Mean lesion diameter was 44.5 mm, with 79.2% colorectal cases. The trainee more frequently performed procedures with lower degree of fibrosis (p = 0.016). En bloc, complete, and curative resection was achieved in 84.7, 81.2, and 76.8% of cases, with no significant differences in resection outcomes or adverse events from trainee involvement.

conclusionsESD can be safely and effectively taught within a 1-year advanced endoscopy fellowship. This was possible in the USA, even with limited gastric lesions, due to a progression focusing on easier portions of complex ESD procedures and advancing as technical progress allowed. Importantly, there was no increase in adverse event rate with trainee involvement in complex ESD cases.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceFellowships and ScholarshipsOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAgedEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesColorectal polypsEndoscopic resectionEndoscopic submucosal dissectionEndoscopic trainingFellowship trainingPolypectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.