ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2019
Alternative characterizations of Fitch's xenology relation.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Theory of Gene Family Histories.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Relative timing information and orthology in evolutionary scenarios.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2023Article
- A simpler linear-time algorithm for the common refinement of rooted phylogenetic trees on a common leaf set.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2021Article
- Indirect identification of horizontal gene transfer.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Best match graphs and reconciliation of gene trees with species trees.Journal of mathematical biology · 2020Article
- Reciprocal best match graphs.Journal of mathematical biology · 2020Article
- Reconstruction of time-consistent species trees.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is an important factor for the evolution of prokaryotes as well as eukaryotes. According to Walter M. Fitch, two genes are xenologs if they are separated by at least one HGT. This concept is formalized through Fitch relations, which are defined as binary relations that comprise all pairs (x, y) of genes x and y for which y has been horizontally transferred at least once since it diverged from the last common ancestor of x and y. This definition, in particular, preserves the directional character of the transfer. Fitch relations are characterized by a small set of forbidden induced subgraphs on three vertices and can be recognized in linear time. The mathematical characterization of Fitch relations is crucial to understand whether putative xenology relations are at least to some extent "biologically feasible". In this contribution, we provide two novel characterizations of Fitch relations. In particular, these results allow us directly to reconstruct gene trees (together with the location of the horizontal transfer events) that explain the underlying Fitch relation. As a biological side result, we can conclude that the phylogenetic signal to infer these gene trees is entirely contained in those pairs of genes x and y for which no directional transfer has been taken place in the common history of y and the last common ancestor of x and y. In other words, non-HGT events provide the essential information about the gene trees. In addition, we utilize the new characterizations to present an alternative, short and elegant proof of the characterization theorem established by Geiß et al. (J Math Bio 77(5), 2018).
Indexed as
Identifiers
31111195What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.