ArticleExperimental brain research2019
Event-related potentials to single-cycle binaural beats and diotic amplitude modulation of a tone.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Analyzing the Impact of Binaural Beats on Anxiety Levels by a New Method Based on Denoised Harmonic Subtraction and Transient Temporal Feature Extraction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Case report: binaural beats music assessment experiment.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Event-related potentials to single-cycle binaural beats of a pure tone, a click train, and a noise.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- A Review of Binaural Bates and the Brain.Basic and clinical neuroscienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When two tones with slightly different frequencies are dichotically presented, binaural beats (BBs) are experienced. BBs resulting from the cycling change in interaural phase difference elicit electroencephalographic responses. Because they repeat at short periods, allowing poor recovery of the cortical responses, these steady-state responses have small amplitudes, and their various wave components intermingle and might mask each other. Using single-cycle BBs separated by relatively long inter-onset intervals would be a solution, but introducing a transient interaural frequency shift requires response subtraction which may not be acceptable for non-additive brain responses. The proposed stimulation method employs transient and monaurally subthreshold frequency shifts in opposite directions in the two ears to produce single-cycle BBs of a 250 Hz tone. These shifts are perceived as distinct BBs when presented dichotically, but remain subthreshold when presented monotically. Therefore, no frequency-shift response is elicited, and the specific BB response is obtained with no need for waveform subtraction. We recorded from 19 normal hearing participants the event-related potentials (ERPs) to single-cycle BBs and also to temporary diotic amplitude modulation (AM) with matched perceptual salience. The ERPs to single-cycle BBs presented at 2 s inter-onset intervals had N1-P2 responses with up to seven times larger amplitudes than the conventional steady-state BB responses in the literature. Significant differences were found between the scalp potential distributions of the N1 responses to BB and AM stimuli, suggesting that the cortical sites, where envelope-based level processing and temporal fine structure-based spatial processing of the stimulus take place, are not totally overlapped.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31111175What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.