Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31110997›Full record

ReviewJournal of exercise rehabilitation2019

Trends in exercise neuroscience: raising demand for brain fitness.

Min Chul Lee, Kyeongho Byun, Ji-Seok Kim, Hojun Lee, Kijeong Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of exercise rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Prevention Methods of Fitness and Bodybuilding Exercise Injury Based on Data Mining.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min Chul LeeDepartment of Sports Medicine, College of Health Science, CHA University, Pocheon, Korea.
Kyeongho ByunFaculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Ji-Seok KimDepartment of Physical Education, College of Education, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea.
Hojun LeeSchool of Sports & Health Science, College of Arts, Kyungsung University, Busan, Korea.
Kijeong KimSchool of Exercise & Sport Science, College of Natural Sciences, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9233-3096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical exercise is increasingly recognized as an important component in the neuroscience related field. What is the targeting of exercise and what accounts for the exercise's benefits observed in neuroscience? Several types of exercise have been studied in various fields across physiological, psychological, and biochemical experiments of neuroscience. However, more clarity is needed to unveil optimal exercise conditions such as frequency, intensity, type, and time. In this review, we briefly highlight the positive effects of exercise on promoting brain function. Key areas relate to exercise neuroscience are as follow: structural level with synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis, functional level with behavioral development, and molecular level with possible mechanisms that involved in exercise-induced brain plasticity. Overall, we provide the importance of understanding the exercise neuroscience and highlight suggestions for future health research.

Indexed as

BrainExerciseNeurogenesisNeuroplasticityNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID31110997
PMCPMC6509468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.