ReviewJournal of pediatric intensive care2016
Clinical Decision Support for Pediatric Blood Product Prescriptions.
Review in Journal of pediatric intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of user-centered clinical decision support on pediatric blood product ordering errors.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2023Article
- Impact of Electronic Data on the Development of Care in Critically Ill Children.Journal of pediatric intensive care · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the 20th century, blood products have been used to effectively treat life-threatening conditions. Over time, we have come to appreciate the many benefits along with significant risks inherent to blood product transfusions. As such, recommendations for the safe and effective use of blood products have evolved over time. Current evidence supports the use of restrictive transfusion strategies that can avoid the risks of unnecessary transfusions. In spite of good evidence, there is a considerable amount of variability in transfusion practices across providers. Clinical decision support (CDS) is an effective tool capable of increasing adherence to evidence-based practices. CDS has been used successfully to improve adherence to transfusion guidelines. Pediatric literature demonstrates strong evidence for the use of CDS to improve appropriateness of red blood cell and plasma transfusion utilization. Further studies in more diverse settings with more standardized reporting are needed to provide more clarity around the effectiveness of CDS in blood product prescriptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.