ReviewJournal of pediatric intensive care2016
Computerized Decision Support Systems for Mechanical Ventilation in Children.
Review in Journal of pediatric intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safely developing respiratory care during emergency neonatal transport through systematic collection and analysis of detailed ventilator data.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Risk Analytics Clinical Decision Support Decreases Duration of Vasoactive Infusions Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Before and After Clinical Trial.Critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Incidence of Mechanical Ventilation Adverse Events in Critically Ill Children in a Tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Turkish thoracic journal · 2022Article
- Continuous noninvasive blood gas estimation in critically ill pediatric patients with respiratory failure.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Use of a Risk Analytic Algorithm to Inform Weaning From Vasoactive Medication in Patients Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.Critical care explorations · 2021Article
- Impact of Electronic Data on the Development of Care in Critically Ill Children.Journal of pediatric intensive care · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation is an effective treatment in the ICU but can have significant adverse effects. Approaches from adult research have been adopted in pediatric critical care despite known differences in respiratory physiology and ICU processes. There continues to be considerable variation in how ventilators are managed. Computerized decision support systems implement explicit protocols, and are designed to make mechanical ventilation management safer, more consistent, and more lung protective. Variable results and low or unknown compliance with protocols and CDSS tools have been reported. To date, there has been limited research regarding CDSS for mechanical ventilation in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.