Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31110890›Full record

ReviewJournal of pediatric intensive care2016

Pediatric Intensive Care Databases for Quality Improvement.

Randall C Wetzel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pediatric intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Designing a national pediatric critical care database: a Delphi consensus study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Organizing and Leading a Multidisciplinary PICU.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Data Science for Child Health.The Journal of pediatrics · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Randall C WetzelDepartment of Anesthesiology Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability and breadth of collected data has grown exponentially in pediatric critical care medicine. This growth is driven by the practitioners' desire to understand and improve practice. In this manuscript, the author details the registry design factors that must be considered to meet quality improvement and safety needs in pediatric critical care units. The challenges to maintain a high standard database and data on health care delivery performances using the VPS registry data are provided.

Indexed as

childrenelectronic databasesintensive carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31110890
PMCPMC6512415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.