ReviewJournal of pediatric intensive care2016
Renal Replacement Therapy in the Pediatric Critical Care Unit.
Review in Journal of pediatric intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Renal Replacement Therapy in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care: A Retrospective Analysis of Modalities, Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Medication patterns and dosing guidance in pediatric patients supported with intermittent hemodialysis or continuous kidney replacement therapy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal replacement therapy is becoming more prevalent in the pediatric intensive care units for a large variety of disease states, including multiorgan dysfunction syndrome, fluid overload, and electrolyte imbalance. Three modalities-continuous renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis-are commonly used. When deciding among the three therapies, there are several advantages and disadvantages of each modality that must be considered. This manuscript provides an overview of each modality as well as its pros and cons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.