ArticleJournal of pediatric intensive care2015
Pediatric Noninvasive Ventilation.
Article in Journal of pediatric intensive care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation via RAM Cannula in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Preliminary Report.International journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Feeding and Swallowing Outcomes in Children Who Use Long-Term Ventilation: A Scoping Review.Dysphagia · 2024Article
- Increased bronchiolitis burden and severity after the pandemic: a national multicentric study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Feeding and swallowing outcomes of children receiving long-term ventilation: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2024Article
- A Retrospective Study of Complications of Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Children on Noninvasive Ventilation.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Adult-size interface during non-invasive ventilation for a child with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: Maintaining principle on a different population.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noninvasive ventilation has been available for many years for use in the pediatric population. Historically, continuous positive airway pressure and bilevel positive airway pressure modes were used for respiratory diseases, including neonatal apnea, bronchiolitis, asthma, and pneumonia. Newer studies suggest that noninvasive ventilation is also an effective and safe mode for support of children with acute respiratory distress syndrome and respiratory failure. The newest type of noninvasive respiratory support is high flow nasal cannula, which has gained popularity in the past few years and its use is being justified in the literature. Studies have shown that these therapies can decrease the need for intubation and ventilation, decrease length of intensive care days, and increase patient comfort. Additional research is needed to support optimal setting selection and recommendations for the use of noninvasive therapies for infants and children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.