ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2018
HPV negative cervical cancers and primary HPV screening.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- The characteristics of high-risk HPV-negative cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- HPV-Independent Cervical Cancer-A New Challenge of Modern Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Role of NTRK Fusion Genes in the Tumor Immune Microenvironment of HPV (+/-) Cervical Cancer.Journal of medical virology · 2025Review
- Human Papillomavirus and Other Relevant Issues in Cervical Cancer Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Mesonephric Tumours of the Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review and Proposal of Embryologically-Oriented Surgical Resection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Human papillomavirus negative high grade cervical lesions and cancers: Suggested guidance for HPV testing quality assurance.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2024Article
- Comparison of multiplex PCR capillary electrophoresis assay and PCR-reverse dot blot assay for human papillomavirus DNA genotyping detection in cervical cancer tissue specimens.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Impact of HPV testing in opportunistic cervical screening: Support for primary HPV screening in the United States.International journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Tumor human papillomavirus: a potential test for cervical cancer prognosis.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- High-risk human papillomavirus genotype distribution among women with gynecology complaints in northwest Ethiopia.Infectious agents and cancer · 2023Article
- Reduced MHC Class I and II Expression in HPV-Negative vs. HPV-Positive Cervical Cancers.Cells · 2022Article
- Metatranscriptome analysis in human papillomavirus negative cervical cancers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Genome-wide association study and functional follow-up identify 14q12 as a candidate risk locus for cervical cancer.Human molecular genetics · 2022Article
- New Insights in the Diagnosis of Rare Adenocarcinoma Variants of the Cervix-Case Report and Review of Literature.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Association between Cervical Microbiota and HPV: Could This Be the Key to Complete Cervical Cancer Eradication?Biology · 2022Review
- Co-testing in cervical screening among 40- to 42-year-old women is unreasonable.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- Visual appearance of the uterine cervix differs on the basis of HPV type status in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: the results of a reliable method.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Diabetes associated with cervical carcinoma among high-risk HPV-infected patients with cytologically diagnosed high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Genomic Risk Factors for Cervical Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than 25 years ago it was established that a HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) infection was the causal factor for cervical cancer. Based on this discovery HPV vaccines were developed and primary HPV screening proposed. The impact of 10 years prophylactic HPV vaccination with the bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines has been tremendous. There is a reduction of HPV infections 16/18, 31, 33 and 45 of respectively 89%, 94%, 79% and 83%. High grade lesions have been reduced by 85% and warts by 90%. Within 20 to 30 years a reduction in cervical cancer incidence, by 70-80%, is to be expected. The 9 valent HPV vaccine, which was introduced last year and is reimbursed for girls between 12 - 19 years, is expected to increase the figures by 14 to 18%. Recently, doubt has been created regarding primary HPV screening. Since 2017, the annual screening report in Belgium suggests that 15% of the cervical cancers were HPV negative. Previous published data in Belgium (period 2001 - 2008) showed that the number of HPV negative tumors is less than half of the suggested figure (7%). Frequent reasons for false negative HPV tumors are the used HPV testing methods and the misclassification of endometrial cancers or metastasis as cervical cancers. Other explanations are the loss of HPV expression and the existence of cervical cancers independent of HPV. The incidence of HPV negative tumors doesn't give any information about the performance of primary HPV screening. Data from randomized controlled trials are very clear: if a woman has a normal cytology and no HPV infection or normal cytology and a HPV infection, then her chance of developing a CIN3 + lesion after 5 years is, respectively, 0,2% and 6%. In Belgium, primary HPV screening with dual-stain cytology triage would considerably reduce the incidence (36%) and mortality (40%) of cervical cancer. There is necessity to improve the screening as we are entering an era of vaccinated women who will get screened. Standardized high quality HPV testing is the key stone for improvement. HPV screening preferable with triage markers is superior to cytology, despite the fact that there are HPV negative cancers. The fact that there are HPV negative cancers should not undermine all idea's regarding primary HPV screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31110650PMC6516188W2989554630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.