Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31110429›Full record

ReviewJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP

Prevalence of malignant melanoma in anatomical sites of the oral cavity: A meta-analysis.

Diksha Singh, Pragya Pandey, Manish Kumar Singh, Shailesh Kudva

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of enoxaparin and aspirin on metastatic spread in a murine melanoma model.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pigmented Oral Lesions: A Multicenter Study.European journal of dentistry · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diksha SinghDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Pragya PandeyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manish Kumar SinghDepartment of Community Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shailesh KudvaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Srinivas Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
King George's Medical University · INDr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral malignant melanoma (OMM) is a very rare disease entity accounting <1% of all other melanomas. Till date, no comprehensive meta-analysis has been conducted regarding the prevalence of malignant melanoma in the oral cavity. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted to update on the prevalence of malignant melanoma in anatomical sites of the oral cavity. Literature search was performed to congregate reports of last 10 years using databases, such as PubMed and ScienceDirect. The search strings used were "palate," "buccal," "gingiva," "gum," "maxillary," "mandibular," "lip," "tongue," "melanoma," "oral melanoma," "malignant melanoma," "prognosis," "risk factors," "noncutaneous" and "diagnosis" of OMM by combining terms using the Boolean operators. MedCalc 16.4.3 software was used for the analysis. "Random effects model" was used in the analysis due to significant heterogeneity in the studies. Proportion method was used to analyze the prevalence. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed to report the analysis. Out of 130 studies screened, 19 were included in the meta-analysis and a total of 1323 patients were included. The median age of the patients was found to be 61.87 ± 7.78 years (confidence interval 53.8-67 years). All the screened studies showed significant heterogeneity in gender as well as tumor sites (

Indexed as

Gingivameta-analysisoral malignant melanomaoral mucosapalateproportiontumor

Identifiers

PMID31110429
PMCPMC6503777
OpenAlexW2986867767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.