ReviewJournal of orthopaedics
A systematic review of the causes of failure of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery on wound infection in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- The impact of retaining the femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Pooled it
- Proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic conditions: a systematic review on current outcomes.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022Pooled it
- Cemented dual mobility component in newly implanted porous tantalum shells for severe acetabular defects: medium-term outcomes from a high-volume single-surgeon series.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Why revision of total hip arthroplasty fails: a retrospective consecutive cohort study of 963 patients.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Acceleration of slice encoding for metal artifact correction at 0.55 T using hexagonal sampling.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Technology in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Recent Advancements.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- The Effect of Implant Size on Fretting Currents of Acetabular Cup-Liner Tapers During in Vitro Cyclic Loading.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025Article
- Association of CXCL16 in aseptic loosening following total hip arthroplasty and its effect on bone metabolism: a case-control study.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Alterations in Circulating miRNAs and Their Potential Role in Aseptic Loosening After Total Hip Replacement: An Observational, Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Advancements in Biomedical Sensors for Early Detection of Failure in Hip and Knee Implants: Scoping Review on Potential Sensors for Implant Integration.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Impact of pay-for-performance program on postoperative infection and revision risk in diabetic patients with hip replacement: a Taiwanese Cohort Study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025Article
- Long-term implant survival, functional, and radiological assessment of cemented stem in revision hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Towards an Automated Computational Workflow to Assess Primary Stability in Total Hip Arthroplasty.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Literature Review for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): Part 2-Material Selection Criteria and Methods.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Literature Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): Part 1-Biomaterials.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- The Efficacy of Defensive Antibacterial Coating (DAC™) Periprosthetic Joint Infection Prevention in the Hip: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Postoperative antibiotic treatment does not lower re-revision rate in presumed aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties with unexpected positive intraoperative cultures - a matched cohort study.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2025Article
- Custom 3D-printed split-type triflange implants for severe acetabular defects: mid-term clinical outcomes and biomechanical insights from finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study reviewed literature published in the last 10 years to investigate the reasons for revision failure. A total of 9952 revisions were identified and it was determined that the number one cause of failure was aseptic loosening (23.19%), followed by instability (22.43%) and infection (22.13%). Further analysis of applicable revisions investigated BMI and age at the failure rates. The rate of rerevision in obese patients was markedly higher (p < 0.01) compared to non-obese patients and individuals receiving a revision THA under the age of 55 are at a higher risk of rerevision (p < 0.01).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.