Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31110328›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2019

Moving from one to many: insights from the growing list of pleiotropic cancer risk genes.

Stephanie A Bien, Ulrike Peters

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Patterns and evolutionary consequences of pleiotropy.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Considerations in assessing germline variant pathogenicity using cosegregation analysis.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie A BienDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. sbien@fredhutch.org.
Ulrike PetersDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.

Funding

Using Functional Genomics to Inform Gene Environment Interactions for Colorectal CancerR01CA201407 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI CASEY, GRAHAM, GAUDERMAN, WILLIAM JAMES · 2016 to 2020
$9.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pleiotropy, a phenomenon in which a single gene affects multiple phenotypes, is becoming very common among different cancer types and cancer-related phenotypes, such as those in hormonal, cardiometabolic and inflammatory/immune conditions. The discovery of pleiotropic associations can improve our understanding of cancer and help to target investigation of genes with greater clinical relevance.

Indexed as

Genetic PleiotropyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansNeoplasmsPenetrancePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID31110328
PMCPMC6738109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.