ArticleNature2019
A DIY approach to automating your lab.
Article in Nature, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering biology and automation-Replicability as a design principle.Engineering biology · 2024Review
- Construction of a Calibration Curve for Lycopene on a Liquid-Handling Platform─Wider Lessons for the Development of Automated Dilution Protocols.ACS synthetic biology · 2024Article
- An engineering biology approach to automated workflow and biodesign.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2024Review
- Open-source personal pipetting robots with live-cell incubation and microscopy compatibility.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Performance and automation of ancient DNA capture with RNA hyRAD probes.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
- Development of a plant conveyance system using an AGV and a self-designed plant-handling device: A case study of DIY plant phenotyping.Breeding science · 2022Article
- Article
- An open-source automated PEG precipitation assay to measure the relative solubility of proteins with low material requirement.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Adapting a Low-Cost and Open-Source Commercial Pipetting Robot for Nanoliter Liquid Handling.SLAS technology · 2021Article
- Building a biofoundry.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2021Review
- Review
- OpenWorkstation: A modular open-source technology for automatedHardwareX · 2020Article
- Automation in the Life Science Research Laboratory.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31110319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.