ArticleNature communications2019
Model-based understanding of single-cell CRISPR screening.
Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine-learning in optimization of CRISPR technology.Machine learning. Health · 2026Review
- A systematic comparison of single-cell perturbation response prediction models.Science advances · 2026Article
- CRISPRing through time: How cutting-edge technology is revolutionizing life sciences and medicine.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Interpretation, extrapolation and perturbation of single cells.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- AI-driven CRISPR screening: optimizing gene editing through automation and intelligent decision support.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Comprehensive perturbation of transcription factors in human cardiomyocytes reveals the regulatory architecture of congenital heart disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- High-throughput screening to engineer optimal T cell therapies: current knowledge and future prospects.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Dissecting cellular ecosystem with single-cell CRISPR screens.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2025Article
- Genetic Convergence Analysis of CRISPR Perturbations Deciphers Gene Functional Similarity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Clinical application of single-cell RNA sequencing in disease and therapy.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Decoding cell fate: integrated experimental and computational analysis at the single-cell level.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Single-cell sequencing technology in renal cancer: insights into tumor biology and clinical application.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Ocelli: an open-source tool for the analysis and visualization of developmental multimodal single-cell data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Decoding heterogeneous single-cell perturbation responses.Nature cell biology · 2025Article
- PerturBase: a comprehensive database for single-cell perturbation data analysis and visualization.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Machine learning to dissect perturbations in complex cellular systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Single-cell omics: experimental workflow, data analyses and applications.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Review
- Single-cell technologies: current and near future.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Article
- Recent progress in prompt molecular detection of liquid biopsy using Cas enzymes: innovative approaches for cancer diagnosis and analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recently developed single-cell CRISPR screening techniques, independently termed Perturb-Seq, CRISP-seq, or CROP-seq, combine pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell RNA-seq to investigate functional CRISPR screening in a single-cell granularity. Here, we present MUSIC, an integrated pipeline for model-based understanding of single-cell CRISPR screening data. Comprehensive tests applied to all the publicly available data revealed that MUSIC accurately quantifies and prioritizes the individual gene perturbation effect on cell phenotypes with tolerance for the substantial noise that exists in such data analysis. MUSIC facilitates the single-cell CRISPR screening from three perspectives, i.e., prioritizing the gene perturbation effect as an overall perturbation effect, in a functional topic-specific way, and quantifying the relationships between different perturbations. In summary, MUSIC provides an effective and applicable solution to elucidate perturbation function and biologic circuits by a model-based quantitative analysis of single-cell-based CRISPR screening data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.