Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31110230›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2019

Tackling the NHS glaucoma clinic backlog issue.

David Charles Broadway, Karen Tibbenham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David Charles BroadwayDirectorate of Ophthalmology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK. davidbroadway@waitrose.com.
Karen TibbenhamDirectorate of Ophthalmology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesto determine whether mass case review, carried out by glaucoma sub-specialist consultants, for patients for whom there was insufficient clinic capacity, could aid reduction of the glaucoma clinic appointment backlog. SUBJECTS/

methodspatient hospital notes were reviewed by a glaucoma fellowship trained consultant and a decision was made as to whether the planned review was appropriate. Decisions were made with respect to timing, clinic-type and necessity for follow-up, together with an assessment as to whether visual field testing was required.

resultsin a 3-year study a total of 9290 cases were included in the study. After consultant review, 5521 (59.5%) patients were kept within the hospital eye service (HES) and an additional 1350 (14.5%) had their next appointment delayed, 384 (4%) were discharged to specialist community glaucoma optometrists and 2035 (22%) were discharged to their standard community optometrists. Overall, therefore 26% of patients were discharged from the HES. Of the planned 9290 appointments, simultaneous visual field testing had been planned for 5393 patients (58%), but after consultant review only 65% (n = 3482) of these were considered necessary, reducing the number of required visual field tests by 35% (n = 1911).

conclusionsthe authors suggest that ophthalmology departments experiencing significant clinic appointment backlog issues, consider utilising trained glaucoma sub-specialist consultants to review planned follow-up management of patients within a backlog deficit.

Indexed as

Waiting ListsContinuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health CareFemaleGlaucomaHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedOphthalmologyReferral and ConsultationSpecializationState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID31110230
PMCPMC7002607
OpenAlexW2946481806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.