ArticleScientific reports2019
The extrahepatic events of Asian patients with primary biliary cholangitis: A 30-year cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hepatic and Extrahepatic Characteristics of Autoimmune Hepatitis: A 23-year Hospital-Based Cohort Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- CT and MR imaging of primary biliary cholangitis: a pictorial review.Insights into imaging · 2023Review
- Acute coronary syndrome after liver transplantation in a young primary biliary cholangitis recipient with dyslipidemia: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2022Article
- APASL clinical practice guidance: the diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis.Hepatology international · 2022Article
- Identification of the Representative Primary Biliary Cholangitis Cohort in Taiwan: A Comparison of Four Nationwide Cohorts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Roles of Adipokines in Digestive Diseases: Markers of Inflammation, Metabolic Alteration and Disease Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extrahepatic complications of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in Asian patients remain elusive. A 30-year cohort study of 150 Taiwanese PBC patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was conducted. Patients with alkaline phosphatase levels >1.67 × ULN after 1-year treatment were considered suboptimal responders. At baseline, of 150 patients (mean age: 53.75 years), 128 (85.3%) were females, and 34 (22.8%) had cirrhosis. The cumulative incidences of various incident events were all-cause mortality or liver transplantation: 46.7%; extrahepatic mortality: 24.5%; extrahepatic malignancies: 8.1%; hypertension: 46.2%; dyslipidemia: 44.1%; diabetes: 30.6%; hyperuricemia: 11.2%; acute coronary syndrome: 3.1%; cerebral vascular accident (CVA): 8.9%; autoimmune diseases: 16%; and osteoporosis: 20.9%. The 5- to 20-year cumulative incidences for all-cause mortality or liver transplantation and extrahepatic mortality were 16.2-41.3% and 3.1-11.9%, respectively. Baseline associations were age and alpha-fetoprotein levels with extrahepatic mortality, 80% due to sepsis; age with extrahepatic malignancies and hypertension; gender and hyperuricemia with CVA; and UDCA response with autoimmune disease. Conclusions: Sepsis accounted for most extrahepatic mortality in PBC patients, and the longer the follow-up was, the higher the extrahepatic/all-cause mortality ratio. Baseline age is crucial for incident extrahepatic events and only CVA shows gender-dimorphism; the association between UDCA response and autoimmune disease requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.