Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31110177›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Genotype-covariate correlation and interaction disentangled by a whole-genome multivariate reaction norm model.

Guiyan Ni, Julius van der Werf, Xuan Zhou, Elina Hyppönen, Naomi R Wray, S Hong Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Methods for modeling gene-environment interplay using polygenic risk scores.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome-Wide Association Study for Weight-Related Traits inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Detecting Non-linear Dependence through Genome Wide Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Gene-environment interactions in human health.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guiyan NiAustralian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.
Julius van der WerfSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
Xuan ZhouAustralian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.
Elina HyppönenAustralian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3670-9399
Naomi R WrayInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7421-3357
S Hong LeeAustralian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia. hong.lee@unisa.edu.au.

Funding

GWA for Gene-Environment Interaction Effects Influencing CHDU01HG004402 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BOERWINKLE, ERIC A. · 2007 to 2009
$1.6M
Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) DP160102126Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) FT160100229Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1078901Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1080157Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1087889NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004402NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100005CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100005GNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100005INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100006CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100007CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100007INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100008CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100008INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100009CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100009INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100010CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100011CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100011INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100012C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomics era has brought useful tools to dissect the genetic architecture of complex traits. Here we propose a multivariate reaction norm model (MRNM) to tackle genotype-covariate (G-C) correlation and interaction problems. We apply MRNM to the UK Biobank data in analysis of body mass index using smoking quantity as a covariate, finding a highly significant G-C correlation, but only weak evidence for G-C interaction. In contrast, G-C interaction estimates are inflated in existing methods. It is also notable that there is significant heterogeneity in the estimated residual variances (i.e., variances not attributable to factors in the model) across different covariate levels, i.e., residual-covariate (R-C) interaction. We also show that the residual variances estimated by standard additive models can be inflated in the presence of G-C and/or R-C interactions. We conclude that it is essential to correctly account for both interaction and correlation in complex trait analyses.

Indexed as

GenotypeModels, GeneticMultivariate AnalysisBody Mass IndexCigarette SmokingGenomicsHumansRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID31110177
PMCPMC6527612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.