ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019
Long-Term Outcome of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Pregnancy-Related Venous Thrombosis.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient-Reported Outcomes in Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Current Challenges, and Ways Forward.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Management of May Thurner Syndrome in Pregnant Patients.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment on Pregnancy-Related Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VT) is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is an effective and safe treatment modality for VT patients. However, the long-term outcome of CDT in pregnancy-related venous thrombosis are unclear. The aim of this study was to assess long-term results of pregnancy-related VT patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We reviewed 41 pregnancy-related deep venous thrombosis (DVT) patients who underwent CDT from February 2008 to May 2015. Clinical data, including demographic variables, disease location, vascular risk factors, treatment regimen, interventional procedure and complications, were collected retrospectively. Clinical and color-duplex ultrasonography were performed to monitor venous patency during follow-up. Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) was assessed with the Villalta scale and quality of life (QOL) was evaluated by the VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire. RESULTS Twenty-three patients underwent spontaneous abortion or induced abortion within 3 months before DVT, and 18 patients had DVT during the first 3 months after delivery. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Grade III (complete) lysis was obtained in 15 patients and grade II (partial) lysis was obtained in 21 patients. The follow-up period was 3 years. Twenty-eight patients had venous patency at 3-year follow-up; 36.6% of patients developed mild or moderate PTS (Villalta score 5-14) and 4.8% with severe PTS (Villalta score ≥15). VEINES-QOL/Sym scores were 55.24±7.35 and 53.25±6.65, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Catheter-directed thrombolysis is a reliable and safe treatment modality for postnatal or abortion patients with DVT. CDT can reduce the incidence rate of PTS and increase the quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.