Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31110131›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2019

Developing Blight-Tolerant American Chestnut Trees.

William A Powell, Andrew E Newhouse, Vernon Coffey

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The switch-liker's guide to plant synthetic gene circuits.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  7. A genome-guided strategy for climate resilience in American chestnut restoration populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Synthetic threads through the web of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William A PowellAmerican Chestnut Research and Restoration Project, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA.
Andrew E NewhouseDepartment of Environmental and Forest Biology, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA.
Vernon CoffeyDepartment of Environmental and Forest Biology, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA.
State University of New York · USSUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An invasive fungal pathogen has reduced the American chestnut (

Indexed as

Plants, Genetically ModifiedFagaceaeGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, PlantHumansOxidoreductasesPlant Diseasesoxalate oxidaseOxidoreductases

Identifiers

PMID31110131
PMCPMC6601460
OpenAlexW2946528769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.