Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31110097›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Evaluating NHS Stop Smoking Service engagement in community pharmacies using simulated smokers: fidelity assessment of a theory-based intervention.

Sandra Jumbe, Wai Y James, Vichithranie Madurasinghe, Liz Steed, Ratna Sohanpal, Tammy K Yau, Stephanie Taylor, Sandra Eldridge, Chris Griffiths, Robert Walton

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra JumbeCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6624-1689
Wai Y JamesCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Vichithranie MadurasingheBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Liz SteedCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Ratna SohanpalCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Tammy K YauDepartment of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, California, USA.
Stephanie TaylorCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Sandra EldridgeCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Chris GriffithsBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7935-8694
Robert WaltonCentre for Health Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBCalifornia Northstate University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSmokers are more likely to quit if they use the National Health Service (NHS) Stop Smoking Service (SSS). However, community pharmacies experience low service uptake. The Smoking Treatment Optimisation in Pharmacies (STOP) programme aims to address this problem by enhancing staff training using a theory-based intervention. In this study, we evaluated intervention fidelity using simulated smokers (actors) to assess smoker engagement and enactment of key intervention components by STOP trained staff.

designAn observational pilot study. SETTINGS: Five community pharmacies in North East London with an NHS SSS.

methodsSix actors, representative of East London's population, were recruited and trained to complete intervention fidelity assessments. Consenting pharmacy staff from five participating pharmacies received STOP Intervention training. Four weeks after the staff training, the actors visited the participating pharmacies posing as smokers eligible for smoking cessation support. Engagement behaviour by pharmacy staff and enactment of intervention components was assessed using a scoring tool derived from the STOP logic model (scoring range of 0-36), and contemporaneous field notes taken by actors.

results18 of 30 completed assessments were with STOP trained staff (10/18 were counter assistants). Mean score for smoker engagement was 24.4 (SD 9.0) points for trained and 16.9 (SD 7.8) for untrained staff, respectively. NHS SSS leaflets (27/30) were the most common smoking cessation materials seen on pharmacy visits. Most trained counter staff engaged with smokers using leaflets and a few proactively offered appointments with their cessation advisors. Appropriate use of body language was reported on 26/30 occasions alongside the use of key phrases from the STOP training session (n=8). Very few pharmacy staff wore STOP promotional badges (4/30).

conclusionsSTOP training may change client engagement behaviour in pharmacy staff and could improve the uptake of the NHS SSS. A cluster randomised controlled trial is currently in progress to evaluate its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16351033.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesEducation, PharmacyHealth BehaviorAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSmoking CessationState MedicineYoung Adultcommunity pharmaciesfidelity assessmentsimulated patientssmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID31110097
PMCPMC6530322
OpenAlexW2945142661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.