Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31109961›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Synaptic Regulation by OPRM1 Variants in Reward Neurocircuitry.

Dina Popova, Nidhi Desai, Julie A Blendy, Zhiping P Pang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Similarities and Differences in Genetics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Neural Network Connectivity Following Opioid Dependence is Altered by a Common Genetic Variant in the µ-Opioid Receptor,The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Association of theJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dina PopovaChild Health Institute of New Jersey.
Nidhi DesaiChild Health Institute of New Jersey.
Julie A BlendyDepartment of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Zhiping P PangChild Health Institute of New Jersey, zhiping.pang@rutgers.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6183-1233
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USTranslational Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

Deciphering the neural basis of alcohol use disorders using human and mouse neuronsR01AA023797 · NIAAA · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ZHIPING P. PANG · 2016 to 2026
$4.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mu-opioid receptors (MORs) are the primary site of action of opioid drugs, both licit and illicit. Susceptibility to opioid addiction is associated with variants in the gene encoding the MOR,

Indexed as

RewardAction PotentialsAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsGenetic VariationInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsMaleMesencephalonMiceMice, TransgenicNerve NetReceptors, Opioid, muSynapsesAnalgesics, OpioidOPRM1 protein, humanReceptors, Opioid, muMORopioid dependenceSNPVTA

Identifiers

PMID31109961
PMCPMC6636083
OpenAlexW2946043857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.