Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31109452›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease2019

Identifying the molecular and cellular signature of cardiac dilation following myocardial infarction.

Merry L Lindsey, Yonggang Ma, Elizabeth R Flynn, Michael D Winniford, Michael E Hall, Kristine Y DeLeon-Pennell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guidelines for in vivo mouse models of myocardial infarction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Cellular and molecular signals of cardiac wound healing after myocardial infarction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Merry L LindseyMississippi Center for Heart Research, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; Research Service, G.V. (Sonny), Montgomery Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1500 E Woodrow Wilson Ave, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; Division of Cardiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Yonggang MaMississippi Center for Heart Research, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Elizabeth R FlynnMississippi Center for Heart Research, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Michael D WinnifordMississippi Center for Heart Research, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; Division of Cardiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Michael E HallMississippi Center for Heart Research, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS 39216, USA; Division of Cardiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Kristine Y DeLeon-PennellResearch Service, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 109 Bee St, Charleston, SC 29401, USA; Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. Electronic address: deleonky@musc.edu.
Jackson Memorial Hospital · USMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

STRUCTURAL VASCULAR ADAPTATION OF THE MICROCIRCULATIONP01HL051971 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER · PI HALL, JOHN E · 1993 to 2018
$39.4M
Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115428 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI JONES, ALAN E · 2016 to 2025
$38.2M
The role of leptin in autoimmune-associated hypertensionP20GM104357 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI TAYLOR, ERIN BASSFORD · 2013 to 2022
$23.4M
TRAININGU54GM114833 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LINDSEY, MERRY L., PING, PEIPEI · 2014 to 2017
$13.8M
Hypertension and Cardiorenal Research Training ProgramT32HL105324 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI Joey P. Granger · 2010 to 2026
$7.8M
The Role of Macrophage-derived MMPs in LV RemodelingR01HL075360 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LINDSEY, MERRY L. · 2004 to 2018
$5.4M
Systems Biology of Fibroblast Activation Following Myocardial InfarctionR01HL129823 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI LINDSEY, MERRY L. · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
Neutrophil Polarization Following Myocardial InfarctionI01BX000505 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI LINDSEY, MERRY L. · 2009 to 2024
–
T-cell regulation of cardiac remodelingIK2BX003922 · VA · RALPH H JOHNSON VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DELEON-PENNELL, KRISTINE Y · 2017 to 2022
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000505BLRD VA IK2 BX003922NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL051971NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL075360NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL129823NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL105324NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104357NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM114833NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing molecular and cellular indicators that reflect the extent of dilation of the left ventricle (LV) after myocardial infarction (MI) may improve diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. We queried the Mouse Heart Attack Research Tool (mHART) 1.0 for day 7 post-MI mice (age 3-9 months, untreated males and females) with serial echocardiographic data at days 0, 1, and 7 (n = 51). Mice were classified into two subgroups determined by a median fold change of 1.6 in end-diastolic dimensions (EDD) normalized to pre-MI values; n = 26 fell below (moderate; mean of 1.42 ± 0.01) and n = 25 fell above this cut-off (extreme; mean of 1.79 ± 0.01; p < 0.001 vs. moderate). Plasma proteomic profiling of 34 analytes measured at day 7 post-MI from male mice (n = 12 moderate and 12 extreme) were evaluated as the test dataset, and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was used to assess strength of biomarkers. Females (n = 6 moderate and 9 extreme) were used as the validation dataset. Both by t-test and characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, lower macrophage inflammatory protein-1 gamma (MIP-1γ), lymphotactin, and granulocyte chemotactic protein-2 (GCP-2) were identified as plasma indicators for dilation status (p < 0.05 for all). Macrophage numbers were decreased and complement C5, laminin 1, and Ccr8 gene levels were significantly higher in the LV infarcts of the extreme dilation group (p < 0.05 for all). A composite panel including plasma MIP-1γ, lymphotactin, and GCP-2, and LV infarct Ccr8 and macrophage numbers strongly mirrored LV dilation status (AUC = 0.92; p < 0.0001). Using the mHART 1.0 database, we determined that a failure to mount sufficient macrophage-mediated inflammation was indicative of exacerbated LV dilation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiomyopathy, DilatedChemokine CXCL6Chemokines, CCDatabases, FactualFemaleHeart VentriclesLymphokinesMacrophage Inflammatory ProteinsMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMyocardial InfarctionProteomicsSialoglycoproteinsCcl9 protein, mouseChemokine CXCL6Chemokines, CCLymphokineslymphotactinMacrophage Inflammatory ProteinsSialoglycoproteinsBig dataCardiovascular diseaseInflammationLV dilationMacrophageMyocardial infarctionProteomics

Identifiers

PMID31109452
PMCPMC6530589
OpenAlexW2889601987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.