Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31109442›Full record

ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2019

[Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence Recognition Technology 
in the Diagnosis of Stage T1 Lung Cancer].

Xiaopeng Liu, Haiying Zhou, Zhixiong Hu, Quan Jin, Jing Wang, Bo Ye

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Toward Systems Pathology for PTEN Diagnostics.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. Navigating patient journey in early diagnosis of lung cancer in India.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaopeng LiuDepartment of Respiratory Disease, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, China.
Haiying ZhouDepartment of Respiratory Disease, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, China.
Zhixiong HuDepartment of Respiratory Disease, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, China.
Quan JinDepartment of Respiratory Disease, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Respiratory Disease, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, China.
Bo YeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China.
Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer is the cancer with the highest morbidity and mortality at home and abroad at present. Using computed tomography (CT) to screen lung cancer nodules is a huge workload. To test the effect of artificial intelligence in automatic identification of lung cancer by using artificial intelligence to find the lung cancer nodules automatically in the chest CT of 1 mm and 5 mm thick.

methods5,000 cases of T1 stage lung cancer patients with 1 mm and 5 mm layer thickness were respectively labeled and learned by computer neural network, the algorithm of forming pulmonary nodules was carried out. 500 cases of chest CT in T1 stage lung cancer patients with 1 mm and 5 mm thickness were tested by artificial intelligence formation, and the sensitivity and specificity were compared with artificial reading.

resultsUsing artificial intelligence to read chest CT 500 in 5 mm, the sensitivity was 95.20%, the specificity was 93.20%, and the Kappa value of two times repeated read was 0.926,1. For 1 mm chest CT 500 cases, the sensitivity is 96.40%, the specificity is 95.60%, and the Kappa reads two times is 0.938,6. Compared with 5 doctors, the same CT sets with 1 mm thickness were read. The detection rates of artificial intelligence and artificial reading were similar to those of lung cancer nodules and negative control read films, and there was no significant difference between them. In the comparison of the same CT slices with 5 mm thickness, the number of detection of lung cancer nodules by artificial intelligence is better than that of artificial reading, and the sensitivity is higher, but the number of false messages is increased and the specificity is slightly worse.

conclusionsThe automatic learning of early lung cancer chest CT images by artificial intelligence can achieve high sensitivity and specificity of early lung cancer identification, and assist doctors in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHumansLung NeoplasmsMedical InformaticsNeoplasm StagingArtificial intelligenceComputed tomographyLung neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31109442
PMCPMC6533191
OpenAlexW2993845515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.