Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31109330›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2019

Inpatient palliative chemotherapy is associated with high mortality and aggressive end-of-life care in patients with advanced solid tumors and poor performance status.

Vitor Fiorin de Vasconcellos, Renata Rcc Bonadio, Guilherme Avanço, Marcelo Vailati Negrão, Rachel Pimenta Riechelmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vitor Fiorin de VasconcellosMedical Oncology Department, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Avenida Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil. vitor.vasconcellos@gmail.com.
Renata Rcc BonadioMedical Oncology Department, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Avenida Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5818-922X
Guilherme AvançoMedical Oncology Department, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Avenida Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil.
Marcelo Vailati NegrãoMedical Oncology Department, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Avenida Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8938-6699
Rachel Pimenta RiechelmannDepartment of Clinical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, R. Prof. Antônio Prudente, 211 - Liberdade, São Paulo, SP, 01509-010, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0107-9617
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo · BRAC Camargo Hospital · BRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefit of palliative chemotherapy (PC) in patients with advanced solid tumors and poor performance status (ECOG-PS) has not been prospectively validated, which makes treatment decision challenging. We aimed to evaluate the overall survival, factors associated with early mortality, and adoption of additional procedures in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer and poor ECOG-PS treated with PC.

methodsWe analyzed a retrospective cohort of patients with advanced cancer treated with PC during hospitalization at an academic cancer center in Brazil from 2014 to 2016. Eligibility criteria included: ECOG-PS 3-4 and start of first-line PC; or ECOG-PS ≥ 2 and start of second or subsequent lines. Primary endpoint was 30-day survival from start of PC. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival estimates and Cox regression for factors associated with 30-day mortality.

resultsTwo hundred twenty-eight patients were eligible. 21.9, 66.7 and 11.4% of patients had ECOG-PS 2, 3 and 4, respectively. 49.6% had gastrointestinal tumors. Median follow-up was 49 days (range 1-507). 98.2% of patients had died, 32% during the index hospitalization. The 30-day and 60-day survival rates were 55.7 and 38.5%, respectively. 30% of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. In a multivariable analysis, ECOG-PS 3/4 (HR 2.01; P = 0.016), hypercalcemia (HR 2.19; P = 0.005), and elevated bilirubin (HR 3.17; P <  0.001) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality.

conclusionsPatients with advanced cancer and poor ECOG-PS had short survival after treatment with inpatient PC. Inpatient PC was associated with aggressive end-of-life care. Prognostic markers such as ECOG-PS, hypercalcemia and elevated bilirubin can contribute to the decision-making process for these patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrazilCohort StudiesDrug TherapyFemaleHospitalizationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative CareProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesCancerChemotherapyHospitalizationLatin AmericaMedical futilityMetastasisPalliativePrognosisRetrospective studySurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID31109330
PMCPMC6528308
OpenAlexW2947541813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.