ReviewPolymers2019
3D Bioprinted Nanocellulose-Based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications: A Brief Review.
Review in Polymers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cultured chicken meat developed by structuring cellular spheroids on an edible bacterial nanocellulose bioscaffold.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- Emerging Biomedical Applications of Sustainable Cellulose Nanocrystal-Incorporated Hydrogels: A Scoping Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- New Frontiers in 3D Printing Using Biocompatible Polymers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Biofabrication of HepG2 Cells-Laden 3D Structures Using Nanocellulose-Reinforced Gelatin-Based Hydrogel Bioinks: Materials Characterization, Cell Viability Assessment, and Metabolomic Analysis.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Alginate-Based Hydrogel Bead Reinforced with Montmorillonite Clay and Bacterial Cellulose-Activated Carbon as an Effective Adsorbent for Removing Dye from Aqueous Solution.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- 3D printing tissue-engineered scaffolds for auricular reconstruction.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Bacterial Cellulose: A Sustainable Source for Hydrogels and 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Development of a Bacterial Nanocellulose/Cationic Starch Hydrogel for the Production of Sustainable 3D-Printed Packaging Foils.Polymers · 2024Article
- Exploring the evolution of bacterial cellulose precursors and their potential use as cellulose-based building blocks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Contribution of the ELRs to the development of advancedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- An overview to nanocellulose clinical application: Biocompatibility and opportunities in disease treatment.Regenerative therapy · 2023Review
- Nanomaterials-incorporated hydrogels for 3D bioprinting technology.Nano convergence · 2023Review
- Three-Dimensional Printed Cellulose for Wound Dressing Applications.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023Article
- Review
- Cellulose Acetate-Supported Copper as an Efficient Sustainable Heterogenous Catalyst for Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition Click Reactions in Water.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Rheology as a Tool for Fine-Tuning the Properties of Printable Bioinspired Gels.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Understanding Nanocellulose-Water Interactions: Turning a Detriment into an Asset.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- Nanocellulose: Recent Advances Toward Biomedical Applications.Small science · 2023Article
- Review of Bacterial Nanocellulose-Based Electrochemical Biosensors: Functionalization, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Formulation and evaluation of a bioink composed of alginate, gelatin, and nanocellulose for meniscal tissue engineering.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanocellulosic materials, such as cellulose nanocrystals, cellulose nanofibers, and bacterial nanocellulose, that display high surface area, mechanical strength, biodegradability, and tunable surface chemistry have attracted great attention over the last decade for biomedical applications. Simultaneously, 3D printing is revolutionizing the field of biomedical engineering, which enables the fast and on-demand printing of customizable scaffolds, tissues, and organs. Nanocellulosic materials hold tremendous potential for 3D bioprinting due to their printability, their shear thinning behavior, their ability to live cell support and owing to their excellent biocompatibility. The amalgamation of nanocellulose-based feedstocks and 3D bioprinting is therefore of critical interest for the development of advanced functional 3D hydrogels. In this context, this review briefly discusses the most recent key developments and challenges in 3D bioprinting nanocellulose-based hydrogel constructs that have been successfully tested for mammalian cell viability and used in tissue engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.