Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31108571›Full record

ArticleEthics & human research2019

Burden or Opportunity? Parent Experiences When Approached for Research in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Erin Paquette, Avani Shukla, Jacob Davidson, Karen Rychlik, Matthew Davis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethics & human research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Experiences and preferences for learning about neonatal research: insights from parent interviews.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin PaquetteAssistant professor of pediatrics at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and an adjunct professor of law at the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law.
Avani ShuklaResearch assistant at the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.
Jacob DavidsonMedical student and research assistant at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Karen RychlikSenior statistician at the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.
Matthew DavisProfessor and the vice chair of the Department of Pediatrics at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and the senior vice president of community health transformation at the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.
Lurie Children's Hospital · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD089260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite an ongoing need for pediatric research, low study enrollment may impede study completion, particularly in critical care. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional survey and chart review study to assess parent experiences with research in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Of the 80 parents who completed the study survey, 54% were approached to participate in a research study in the PICU, and 93% agreed to participate. Motivators included altruism, low burden, low risk, and research that would benefit the child. Barriers included risks to the child, the child's being too sick to participate, feeling overwhelmed, not having enough time to participate, the research's being burdensome, and the research's not being explained well. PICU parents had mostly favorable attitudes toward research participation. Compared with non-Hispanic survey respondents, respondents of Hispanic ethnicity less often reported having been approached for research, which further evidences the need to track research recruitment processes to help avoid underinclusion of members of minority populations.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdultAnxietyChildCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaleMotivationParental ConsentParentsProspective Studieshuman subjects researchparental consentpediatric research participantsresearch benefitsresearch burdens

Identifiers

PMID31108571
PMCPMC10332171
OpenAlexW2946762952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.