Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31108570›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2019

Self-control in crows, parrots and nonhuman primates.

Rachael Miller, Markus Boeckle, Sarah A Jelbert, Anna Frohnwieser, Claudia A F Wascher, Nicola S Clayton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Inhibitory control tests in non-human animals: validity, reliability, and perspectives.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dynamic inconsistency in great apes.Scientific reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Waiting for a better possibility: delay of gratification in corvids and its relationship to other cognitive capacities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The psychological foundations of reputation-based cooperation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachael MillerDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-9571
Markus BoeckleDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0738-2764
Sarah A JelbertDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-0648
Anna FrohnwieserDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5219-4319
Claudia A F WascherSchool of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4360-363X
Nicola S ClaytonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-423X

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council 3399933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-control is critical for both humans and nonhuman animals because it underlies complex cognitive abilities, such as decision-making and future planning, enabling goal-directed behavior. For instance, it is positively associated with social competence and life success measures in humans. We present the first review of delay of gratification as a measure of self-control in nonhuman primates, corvids (crow family) and psittacines (parrot order): disparate groups that show comparable advanced cognitive abilities and similar socio-ecological factors. We compare delay of gratification performance and identify key issues and outstanding areas for future research, including finding the best measures and drivers of delayed gratification. Our review therefore contributes to our understanding of both delayed gratification as a measure of self-control and of complex cognition in animals. This article is categorized under: Cognitive Biology > Evolutionary Roots of Cognition Psychology > Comparative Psychology.

Indexed as

CrowsParrotsPrimatesSelf-ControlAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCognitionHumanscomparative cognitioncorvidsdelayed gratificationparrotsself-control

Identifiers

PMID31108570
PMCPMC6852083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.