Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31108458›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2019

Dissociating frontal and temporal correlates of phonological and semantic fluency in a large sample of left hemisphere stroke patients.

Charlotte S M Schmidt, Kai Nitschke, Tobias Bormann, Pia Römer, Dorothee Kümmerer, Markus Martin, Roza M Umarova, Rainer Leonhart, Karl Egger, Andrea Dressing and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Differences in neuropsychological performance across clinical variants of progressive supranuclear palsy.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Chinese Verbal Fluency Deficiency in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy with and without Hippocampal Sclerosis: A Multiscale Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neural evidence of switch processes during semantic and phonetic foraging in human memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte S M SchmidtDept. of Neurology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Germany; Biological and Personality Psychology, Dept. of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany. Electronic address: charlotte.schmidt@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Kai NitschkeDept. of Neurology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Germany; Biological and Personality Psychology, Dept. of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Tobias BormannDept. of Neurology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Pia RömerFreiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Dorothee KümmererDept. of Neurology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Markus MartinDept. of Neurology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Roza M UmarovaDept. of Neurology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Rainer LeonhartSocial Psychology and Methodology, Dept. of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Karl EggerFreiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; Dept. of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany.
Andrea DressingDept. of Neurology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Mariachristina MussoDept. of Neurology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Klaus WillmesDept. of Neurology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.
Cornelius WeillerDept. of Neurology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Christoph P KallerDept. of Neurology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; Dept. of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany. Electronic address: christoph.kaller@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
University of Freiburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Freiburg · DEBrain (Germany) · DERWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous lesion studies suggest that semantic and phonological fluency are differentially subserved by distinct brain regions in the left temporal and the left frontal cortex, respectively. However, as of yet, this often implied double dissociation has not been explicitly investigated due to mainly two reasons: (i) the lack of sufficiently large samples of brain-lesioned patients that underwent assessment of the two fluency variants and (ii) the lack of tools to assess interactions in factorial analyses of non-normally distributed behavioral data. In addition, previous studies did not control for task resource artifacts potentially introduced by the generally higher task difficulty of phonological compared to semantic fluency. We addressed these issues by task-difficulty adjusted assessment of semantic and phonological fluency in 85 chronic patients with ischemic stroke of the left middle cerebral artery. For classical region-based lesion-behavior mapping patients were grouped with respect to their primary lesion location. Building on the extension of the non-parametric Brunner-Munzel rank-order test to multi-factorial designs, ANOVA-type analyses revealed a significant two-way interaction for cue type (semantic vs. phonological) by lesion location (left temporal vs. left frontal vs. other as stroke control group). Subsequent contrast analyses further confirmed the proposed double dissociation by demonstrating that (i) compared to stroke controls, left temporal lesions led to significant impairments in semantic but not in phonological fluency, whereas left frontal lesions led to significant impairments in phonological but not in semantic fluency, and that (ii) patients with frontal lesions showed significantly poorer performance in phonological than in semantic fluency, whereas patients with temporal lesions showed significantly poorer performance in semantic than in phonological fluency. The anatomical specificity of these findings was further assessed in voxel-based lesion-behavior mapping analyses using the multi-factorial extension of the Brunner-Munzel test. Voxel-wise ANOVA-type analyses identified circumscribed parts of left inferior frontal gyrus and left superior and middle temporal gyrus that significantly double-dissociated with respect to their differential contribution to phonological and semantic fluency, respectively. Furthermore, a main effect of lesion with significant impairments in both fluency types was found in left inferior frontal regions adjacent to but not overlapping with those showing the differential effect for phonological fluency. The present study hence not only provides first explicit evidence for the anatomical double dissociation in verbal fluency at the group level but also clearly underlines that its formulation constitutes an oversimplification as parts of left frontal cortex appear to contribute to both semantic and phonological fluency.

Indexed as

PhoneticsSemanticsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain MappingFemaleFrontal LobeHumansLanguage TestsMaleMiddle AgedStrokeTemporal LobeYoung AdultBrain lesionDouble dissociationFrontal lobeTemporal lobeVerbal fluency

Identifiers

PMID31108458
PMCPMC6526291
OpenAlexW2941805816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.