Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31108008›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2019

Potency Analysis of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Using a Phospho-STAT Matrix Loop Analytical Approach.

Raghavan Chinnadurai, Augustine Rajakumar, Andrew J Schneider, Wade A Bushman, Peiman Hematti, Jacques Galipeau

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advanced Technologies for Potency Assay Measurement.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Integrated analysis of the tumor microenvironment using a reconfigurable microfluidic cell culture platform.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raghavan ChinnaduraiDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Augustine RajakumarDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Andrew J SchneiderDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Wade A BushmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Peiman HemattiDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Jacques GalipeauDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9374-1996
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USEmory University · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Cytokine primed autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for therapy of colitis.R01DK109508 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GALIPEAU, JACQUES · 2016 to 2019
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potency assays for mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) need to be defined in advanced clinical trials. Here, we have developed an assay matrix approach that captures the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) phosphorylation of MSCs upon stimulation with their combined secretome that arose with the interaction of activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Secretome of heat-inactivated (HI) MSCs cocultured with and without activated PBMCs was used as an internal reference. We have compared the short-term phosphorylation status of STAT1, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5, and STAT6 on MSCs derived from human bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord using phosflow technology. Secretome of live MSCs cocultured with activated PBMCs downregulate STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation on MSCs, whereas the secretome of HI-MSCs or PBMCs do not. Thus, investigation of the combined secretome of MSC and PBMC interaction on MSCs determine the potency of MSCs as the generator and sensor of the secretome. Bone marrow, adipose, and umbilical cord MSCs are comparable in modulating STAT1 and STAT3 responses. Measurements of STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation on MSCs as responder cells correlate and predict allogeneic T-cell suppression. Our comparative phosphomatrix approach between live and reference HI-MSCs defines the potency of MSCs as both stimulators and responders as part of a robust platform for predictive potency analysis. Stem Cells 2019;37:1119-1125.

Indexed as

Immune ToleranceBone Marrow CellsHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsPhosphorylationSTAT1 Transcription FactorSTAT3 Transcription FactorT-LymphocytesSTAT1 protein, humanSTAT1 Transcription FactorSTAT3 protein, humanSTAT3 Transcription FactorAssay matrixImmune suppressionMesenchymal stromal cellsPhosflowPhospho-STATPotency analysis

Identifiers

PMID31108008
PMCPMC6729138
OpenAlexW2946584140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.