Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31107914›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Uniform 3D meshes to establish normative facial averages of healthy infants during the first year of life.

Sander Brons, Jene W Meulstee, Rania M Nada, Mette A R Kuijpers, Ewald M Bronkhorst, Stefaan J Bergé, Thomas J J Maal, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Workflow and Strategies for Recruitment and Retention in Longitudinal 3D Craniofacial Imaging Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sander BronsDepartment of Dentistry, Section of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5263-4804
Jene W MeulsteeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Rania M NadaFaculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Jabriya Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Mette A R KuijpersDepartment of Dentistry, Section of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6462-9789
Ewald M BronkhorstDepartment of Dentistry, Section of Preventive and Curative Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Stefaan J BergéDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Thomas J J MaalDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Anne Marie Kuijpers-JagtmanDepartment of Dentistry, Section of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8172-0090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging systems are replacing direct anthropometry as the preferred method for capturing facial soft-tissues. Aims of this study were: (1) to develop normative average 3D faces of healthy infants aged 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and (2) to describe normative average 3D facial growth data in infants aged 3 to 12 months. Three-dimensional images of 50 healthy children were acquired at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of age using the 3dMDcranial system. Four average faces with uniform meshes (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) were developed and registered based on the children's reference frames. Distance maps of growth of the total facial surface and of the nose, upper lip, chin, forehead and cheeks for the intervals 3 to 6 months, 6 to 9 months, and 9 to 12 months of age were calculated. Mean growth of the total facial surface was 3.9 mm (standard deviation [SD] 1.2 mm), 3.5 mm (SD 0.9 mm), and 1.6 mm (SD 0.7 mm) at 3 to 6 months, 6 to 9 months, and 9 to 12 months, respectively. Regarding the selected regions of the face, the mean growth of the nose and upper lip were the largest (3.7 mm and 3.6 mm, respectively) between 6 and 9 months of age. The mean growth of the forehead, cheeks and chin were the largest (5.4 mm, 3.2, and 4.7 mm, respectively) between 3 and 6 months of age. For all facial regions, growth clearly diminished from 9 to 12 months of age. Normative data on the growth of the full face, nose, upper lip, chin, forehead and cheeks are presented. Such data can be used in future studies to identify the effectiveness of treatment of orofacial deformities such as orofacial clefts during the first year of life.

Indexed as

Age FactorsCephalometryFaceFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMaxillofacial DevelopmentModels, AnatomicNetherlandsReference Values

Identifiers

PMID31107914
PMCPMC6527206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.