ArticlePloS one2019
Identification of Bacillus species: Implication on the quality of probiotic formulations.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety Evaluation ofFood science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Review
- In Vitro Characterization of Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum Strains: Probiotic Potential, Riboflavin Production, and Functional Properties.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- Whole genome sequencing and molecular characterization of twoFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of antibiotic resistance in emerging strains of Bacillus cereus and antibiotic potency estimations of Oxytetracycline.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Characterization and In Vitro Probiotic Assessment ofFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Randomized Clinical Trials Demonstrate the Safety Assessment ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Combating antibiotic resistance in a one health context: a plethora of frontiers.One health outlook · 2024Review
- Plants Restoration Drives the Gobi Soil Microbial Diversity for Improving Soil Quality.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimization of fermentation parameters to improve the biosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles by Bacillus licheniformis F1 and its comprehensive application.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Prevalence, Virulence Potential, and Growth in Cheese ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Molecular characterization andFrontiers in chemistry · 2023Article
- PreliminaryIranian journal of veterinary research · 2023Article
- Article
- Identification, characterization and antibiotic susceptibility testing forIranian journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Characterization of subtilosin gene in wild type Bacillus spp. and possible physiological role.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Current Progress and Future Perspectives on the Use of Bacillus clausiiMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- EnterotoxigenicFrontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Probiotics: Should All Patients Take Them?Microorganisms · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spores of several Bacillus species have long history of consumption and safe use as probiotics and a variety of formulations containing these organisms are available in the global market. Considering the difficulties in the identification of Bacillus species and the poor microbiological quality of many probiotic formulations, we used three up-to-date methodological approaches for analyzing the content of ten formulations marketed in Italy and labeled to contain Bacillus spores. We compared the performance of biochemical tests based on the BCL Vitek2 card and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, using 16S rDNA sequencing as the reference technique. The BCL card performed well in identifying all Bacillus probiotic strains as well as the Bruker's MALDI Biotyper. Nevertheless, the MALDI score values were sometimes lower than those indicated by the manufacturer for correct species identification. Contaminant bacteria (Lysinibacillus fusiformis, Acinetobacter baumannii, Bacillus cereus, Brevibacillus choshinensis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus badius) were detected in some formulations. Characterization of the B. cereus contaminant showed the potential pathogenicity of this strain. Microbial enumeration performed by the plate count method revealed that the number of viable cells contained in many of the analyzed products differed from the labeled amount. Overall, our data show that only two of the ten analyzed formulations qualitatively and quantitatively respect what is on the label. Since probiotic properties are most often strain specific, molecular typing of isolates of the two most common Bacillus species, B. clausii and B. coagulans, was also performed. In conclusion, the majority of the analyzed products do not comply with quality requirements, most likely leading to reduced/absent efficacy of the preparation and representing a potential infective risk for consumers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.