Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31107703›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2019

Recent developments in imaging of epilepsy.

Roland Wiest, Roland Beisteiner

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Roland WiestInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Roland BeisteinerDepartment of Neurology, Highfield MR Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewImaging constitutes one of the key pillars in the diagnostic workup after a first seizure as well as for the presurgical workup in epilepsy. The role of imaging in emergency situations, mainly to support the adequate diagnosis, as well as its role in planning of noninvasive image-guided therapies is less well established. Here, we provide an overview on peri-ictal imaging findings to support differential diagnosis in emergency situations and describe recent attempts toward minimal invasive therapy in the treatment of epilepsy and its comorbidities based on a combination of imaging techniques with ultrasound. RECENT

findingsPeri-ictal perfusion changes can differentiate ictal stroke mimics from acute ischemic stroke if focal areas of increased perfusion are depicted by computed tomography or MRI. Postictal perfusion patterns in patients with persisting neurological symptoms are frequently normal and do not reach enough diagnostic sensitivity to differentiate between stroke and its mimics. Noninvasive magnetic resonance-techniques as arterial spin labeling may provide a higher sensitivity, especially in combination with diffusion-weighted and susceptibility-weighted MRI. Imaging guided focused ultrasound (FUS) bears the potential to ablate epileptogenic tissue and allows suppression of epileptic activity. Imaging guided blood-brain-barrier opening with FUS offers new options for local drug administration. SUMMARY: MRI should be considered the method of choice in the differential diagnosis of peri-ictal imaging findings and their differential diagnosis. A combination of various MRI techniques with FUS opens new avenues for treatment of epilepsy.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrainBrain IschemiaDiagnosis, DifferentialElectroencephalographyEpilepsyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingSeizuresStrokeTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID31107703
PMCPMC6635047
OpenAlexW2944426477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.