Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31107537›Full record

ArticleMutagenesis2019

DNA damage in human whole blood caused by radiopharmaceuticals evaluated by the comet assay.

Heinz H Schmeiser, Karl-Rudolf Muehlbauer, Walter Mier, Ann-Christin Baranski, Oliver Neels, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Peter Schmezer, Clemens Kratochwil, Frank Bruchertseifer, Alfred Morgenstern and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mutagenesis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  5. Hematologic safety ofEJNMMI research · 2021
    Article
  6. Cancer Tendency in a Patient with ZNF341 Deficiency.Journal of clinical immunology · 2020
    Article
  7. Biological Effects Associated with Internal and External Contamination of Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Sources: AnIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Heinz H SchmeiserDivision of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karl-Rudolf MuehlbauerDivision of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld, Heidelberg, Germany.
Walter MierDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ann-Christin BaranskiDivision of Radiopharmaceutical Development, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, Hugstetter Straße, Freiburg, Germany.
Oliver NeelsDivision of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld, Heidelberg, Germany.
Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-StraussClinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, Germany.
Peter SchmezerDivision of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld Heidelberg, Germany.
Clemens KratochwilDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frank BruchertseiferEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Nuclear Safety and Security, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Alfred MorgensternEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Nuclear Safety and Security, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Klaus KopkaDivision of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld, Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DEJoint Research Centre · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiopharmaceuticals used for diagnosis or therapy induce DNA strand breaks, which may be detectable by single-cell gel electrophoresis (called comet assay). Blood was taken from patients before and at different time points after treatment with radiopharmaceuticals; blood cells were investigated by the comet assay using the percentage of DNA in the tail as the critical parameter. Whereas [225Ac]Ac-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 alpha therapy showed no difference relative to the blood sample taken before treatment, beta therapy with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 3 h post-injection revealed a small but significant increase in DNA strand breaks. In blood of patients who underwent positron emission tomography (PET) with either [18F]2-fluor-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) or [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, an increase of DNA migration determined by the comet assay was not found when analysed at different time points (2-70 min) after intravenous tracer injection. Human whole blood was incubated with the targeted clinically relevant therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617, [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [90Y]Y-DOTA(0)-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide (DOTA-TOC) at different activity concentrations (kBq/ml) for 5 days and then analysed by the comet assay. DNA damage increased with higher concentrations of all radiolabeled compounds tested. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 caused higher blood cell radiotoxicity than equal activity concentrations of [90Y]Y-DOTA-TOC. Likewise, whole human blood was exposed to the positron emitters [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in vitro for 24 h with activity concentrations ranging between 5 and 40 MBq/ml. The same activity concentration dependent elevated DNA migration was observed for both compounds although decay energies are different. This study demonstrated that the amount of DNA damage detected by the comet assay in whole human blood is similar among different positron emitters and divergent by a factor of 200 between alpha particles and beta radiation.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsComet AssayAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesDNA DamageDose-Response Relationship, DrugFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID31107537
PMCPMC6753384
OpenAlexW2945865481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.