Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31106975›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2019

Application of 3D-printed Customized Guides in Subtalar Joint Arthrodesis.

Xiao-Jun Duan, Hua-Quan Fan, Fu-You Wang, Peng He, Liu Yang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Application of patient-specific surgical guides in foot and ankle surgery.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiao-Jun DuanCenter for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7644-2452
Hua-Quan FanCenter for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Fu-You WangCenter for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Peng HeChongqing Institute of Optics and Mechanics, Chongqing, China.
Liu YangCenter for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.

Funding

Chongqing Science and Technology Commission Fund CSTC, 2016shmszx0630Southwest Hospital Fund SWH2016BZGFGJJ-02Southwest Hospital Fund SWH2017JSZD-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the feasibility of 3D printed customized guides assisting the precise drilling of Kirschner wires in subtalar joint arthrodesis.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 29 patients (30 subtalar joints) who underwent subtalar joint arthrodesis between 1 July 2013 and 31 December 2017. The customized guides were designed on a full-scale 3D polylactic acid model made from computed tomography (CT) data of patients by Model Intestinal Microflora in Computer Simulation (MIMICS) software, which were manufactured by 3D printing technology. A total of 14 joints used customized guides (experimental group); the remained 16 joints used the traditional method (control group). The time of drilling the Kirschner wires to the correct position, the time of subtalar fusion, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and complications were evaluated in both groups.

resultsAll customized guides were successfully manufactured. In the experimental group, it took 2.1 ± 0.7 min to drill the Kirschner wire to the satisfactory position, and 2 cases needed to be re-drilled; in the control group, it took 4.6 ± 1.9 min to drill the Kirschner wire to the satisfactory position (P < 0.05), and 8 cases needed to be re-drilled. No serious complications occurred in both groups during and after the surgery. Postoperative radiographic fusion was confirmed in all cases. No significant difference was observed in the fusion time and AOFAS scores 1 year postoperatively between the two groups (P > 0.05).

conclusionIt is safe to apply 3D-printed customized guides for subtalar joint arthrodesis, which can assist the accurate drilling of Kirschner wires into the appropriate position according to the preoperative plan, and reduce the operation time as well as intraoperative radiation.

Indexed as

Models, AnatomicPrinting, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedArthritisArthrodesisBone WiresFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative CarePreoperative Care3D printingArthrodesisCustomized guideSubtalar joint

Identifiers

PMID31106975
PMCPMC6595118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.